And so this is not like a math problem set or a physics problem set. Or, like a high school physics lab, where we all know what the answer should be, and you could fake your lab results anyway.

或是物理问题集合,又或者是高中的物理实验室，我们对这些问题都有确切的答案，或者你可以把你的实验结果改成正确的，有些事情是不能明确界定的。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

I know this is a simple example, but when you mature as a programmer, one of the first things you should do when you sit down to tackle some problem is write something like this pseudo code.

我知道这是个很简单的例子，但是当你们成长为一名程序员后，当你们碰到问题后第一件事情就是,该写一些类似于,伪代码的东西。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

I said, "Well if you can understand tomorrow's lecture that's today's lecture-- then you should have no problem."

我说,如果你能听懂明天的课,也就是今天这课,那你不会有问题的

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

She is the head TA and she's the one you should write to whenever you have a problem.

她是首席助教,只要你有疑问,都可以给她发邮件

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

So this should immediately look like a problem because we know, in fact, that methane is tetravalent, and this is telling us it's only divalent.

显然这看起来是一个问题,因为我们知道实际上，甲烷是四价的，而这告诉我们它仅仅是二价的。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

This is where, the way that we should start every problem set or ever problem.

这是我们,解决任何问题的最初一步。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

One problem that people have is understanding what a portion is, because you say we should have this many servings of fruits and vegetables a day, we should have this many servings of that a day.

人类很难理解每餐食物摄入量这概念,因为假设,我们一天应该摄入一定份量的水果和蔬菜,各种食物每天都有一定摄入量

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

So certainly part of the problem here, with the reasoning I just gave you-- the reasoning that said I should choose Beta, because if we both reason the same way, we both do better that way-- involves some kind of magical reasoning.

那么说问题就出在了这里,就是之前我们说应该选β的问题,如果我们要都这么想,确实得到更好成绩,但这是有前提的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And this should look kind of familiar to some of the problems you may have seen on the problem-set if you started it this weekend.

如果你们这周就开始做习题集的话,这样的题目你们,应该会觉得很熟悉。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Maybe I will add this on as a problem you should do in your homework.

也许我会把这个作为,练习题加到你们的作业中去

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

There was a conditional agreement: yes, Norway should manage this oil risk but it's politically difficult and that's the problem-- is that we're not able to do our optimal management.

他们在一定程度上同意我的观点：,是的，挪威应该设法解决石油的风险,但这在政治上很困难,其问题在于-,挪威无法做到最优的管理。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

So, just, if you can take what I'm saying for a moment right now that in fact this should collapse in this very small time frame, we have to see that there's a problem with one of these two things, either the Coulomb force law or Newtonian mechanics. So, what do you guys think is probably the issue here?

所以如果你们考虑我,开始说的这个塌缩应该,发生在很短的时间里，那么这两者之一就有问题,要么是库伦定律,要么是牛顿力学,你们觉得应该是哪个的问题？

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选