So, for example, for the chlorine case, we would say that the electron affinity for chlorine is actually positive 349 kilojoules per mole.
比如,以氯为例,我们可以说氯的电子亲和能,应该等于正的,349,千焦每摩尔。
And, one other thing that I failed to point out, if you take a look at the energies associated with the outermost electrons, in this case, lithium, you see it's 0.5 megajoules per mole, and then what's the 6.26?
还有另外一点我忘记提到的是,如果你观察离最外层,的电子的能量,在这种情况,对于锂,你可以得到,它是每摩尔0。5兆焦,那么6。26是什么呢?
In the case of Burt Malkiel's data, more than 11% per year and in the case of Roger Ibbotson's data between 7% and 8% per year of those returns can be explained either by backfill bias or survivorship bias.
在伯特·麦基尔的数据中,超过11%的年平均收益,在罗杰·伊博森的数据中,7%到8%的年平均收益,可以用生存偏差或回填偏差来解释
应用推荐