If you're not updating some variable by incrementing it or decrementing it -- if you're not changing anything, presumably the conditions are never going to evaluate to false or the opposite, so you're just going to have an infinite loop, which might be your goal, but odds are it's not.
如果你不通过增加或减少它来改变一些变量,-如果你不改变什么,大概那个条件永远不会变成错误的,或相反的,所以你将得到一个无限循环,那可能是你的目标,但可能也不是。
Or in some sense does it go just the opposite?
或者某种程度上它会不会恰好是相反的?
Doing anything you like, it seems to be the opposite of the platonic understanding of justice as each one doing a special function ? or fulfilling or doing a special craft.
做你爱做的事,这似乎有别于,柏拉图所理解的正义,不是要每个人都拥有一样,特殊的功用或善尽或发挥一种特殊技能吗。
So I changed the colors here to show that these are 2 p orbitals with an opposite phase or an opposite sign.
我这里换了一种颜色,表示2p轨道,不同的相位或者是正负号。
Well, what if you knew the sequence for the messenger RNA that made insulin and you designed another single stranded DNA or RNA molecule that was the exact opposite, or the exact compliment, I should say, of that strand?
那么,如果你知道了,合成胰岛素的mRNA的序列,并设计一段与其序列完全相反的,DNA或者RNA分子,应该说是完全互补的一段分子
应用推荐