Satan's saying that before the war in heaven, God's power just seemed like any other king's power, as if God sat on the throne of heaven merely because of those humanly constructed reasons of tradition, or of old repute or consent or custom.
撒旦是说在这场天上的大战之前,上帝的力量就和其他国王的力量一样,他坐在天堂的宝座上似乎仅仅是因为,人们自己营造的原因和传统,或者说是他过期的声望,他制定的法规以及约定俗成的规矩。
So, all right. Good. Are there any other defenders who say it's just categorically wrong, with or without consent?
很好,有没其他人要辩护的,谁认为就是绝对错的,不管有没征得同意?
Relations of authority exist only by, so to speak, the consent or the will of the governed.
权威的关系只在,允诺和意愿被管理的人那里存在。
Now, if Parker did give his consent, would it be all right, do you think or not?
那如果派克的确同意了,你觉得杀他是正当的吗?
What has or ought to have a claim ? on our loyalty and rational consent?
哪一种能够或应能掳获,我们的忠诚及理性同意?
But still, it must be with his own consent, I.E. The consent of the majority, " giving it either by themselves, or through their representatives."
但是这仍须得到他自己的同意,即得到大多数的同意,由他们自己或选出的代表所表示的大多数同意“
It is the product, the creation of the people or of what we might call, in Jeffersonian language, it is the product of the consent of the governed.
我们可以说它是人民权力的产物,但若用杰斐逊的话讲,我们也可以说它是,统治者们互相默许下的产物。
Disappointment number two, once there is a legitimate government based on consent, the only limits for Locke are limits on arbitrary takings of life or of liberty or of property.
失望的第二点,一旦经过同意建立合法政府后,对洛克来说它唯一的限制,就是不能肆意夺取生命或自由或财产。
Sometimes, when the ideas of political philosophers are as familiar as Locke's ideas about consent, it's hard to make sense of them or at least to find them very interesting.
有时当一些政治哲学家对同意的看法,与洛克非常相似时,都让人很难理解,或至少不会觉得很有趣。
Then there are some who say the real problem here is the lack of consent, whether the lack of consent to a lottery, to a fair procedure or, Kathleen's idea, lack of consent at the moment of death.
还有人认为,真正的问题在于,没有征得同意,不管是没有征得同意抽签,用公平程序进行,或者是凯思琳所说,没有征得派克的同意杀他。
应用推荐