On the other hand, we've just argued that you don't have a dominant strategy here; it's not the case that easy dominates hard.

我们刚才说这里没有优势策略,平坦之途并不总是优于崎岖之途

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So in previous definitions, we've seen the qualifier, for all, be on the other player's strategy.

在以前的定义中,“对所有的”这个限定词,修饰的是其他参与人的策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The second question was about China and there was a special report in the recent Economist talking about the ravenous appetite that China has for natural resources right now. I was curious what you ? thought the effect that would have on global financial ? markets and your investing strategy?

第二个问题是有关于中国的,在最近的《经济学人》杂志上有一篇特别报道,该报道是关于现在中国对自然资源的极度渴望,我非常想知道您个人认为,他们这种情况对全球金融市场会有什么影响呢,对您的投资策略又有什么影响呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Here, the qualifier for all is on my strategy.

在这里修饰的是我的策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Here you are, you're working for Mckinsey, you've been hired by Joe Smith and Ann blogs to figure out their strategy, working on a problem in a team on working on my homework assignments.

你是在为麦肯锡工作,你被乔史密斯和安博客录用,帮他们寻找合理策略,或者在学习小组里一起做作业

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So very similar idea, but the only thing is, I'm slightly abusing notation here by saying that my payoff depends on my strategy and a belief, but what I really mean is my expected payoff.

这和以前的概念差不多,唯一的不同,就是我这里稍微用了一些数学符号,来表述策略带来的收益与所持信念有关,这里的收益指的是预期收益

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We learned that in this game deleting strategies that are never best response, and then deleting strategies that are never best response to anything that is a best response and so on and so forth, yielded a single strategy for each player.

我们学到了在剔除,非最佳对策的策略后,要再剔除那些在对手最佳对策下,不是最佳对策的策略,以此类推,最后每个参与人都只有一个策略了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

You can't think that it really could make so much difference in the real world how prices and quantitie and welfare, and profit is going to work out depending on some thought experiment about how I think about my strategy set.

你们很难想象在现实世界里,价格 产量 福利和利润会因为,不同策略集合设定下的思想实验,而产生如此巨大的变化

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Why is it that when we see these law partners, or medical partners, or whatever it happens to be, or students together on a homework assignment, why is it we tend to get inefficiently little effort when we start figuring out the strategy and working through the game?

为什么这些律师事务所的律师,医疗合伙人或者其他类似的机构,还有一起做作业的学生,当我们研究过这些策略和博弈后,为何这样的组合往往是收效甚微的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选