Now Brooks then uses these terms in ways that should be familiar to us, as I say. We have now been amply exposed to them in reading Jakobson and de Man.
而就想我之前说过的那样,布鲁克斯,用一种我们熟悉的方式运用这两个词,我们在读雅各布森和德曼的著作时已经充分见识过了。
Now this is the point at which we need to say something about a number of key terms that Derrida uses to sustain this sort of criticism of traditional ideas of language.
所以现在我们需要说一些,德里达的关键词,这些关键词用来维持对语言的传统想法的批评。
It could be the pair of none, none, it could be the pair of, you know, whatever the answer was that we put up there. That value comes back out and is now available inside the scope of Barnyard. OK. And Barnyard then uses that. Question?
也可以是,你知道,任何我们在这里得到的答案,这个返回的值在Barnyard范围内,就可以使用了,然后Barnyard就使用了这个值,有什么问题吗?
Indeed, swap in your printout there is just defined as now taking *a and *b and then it also uses the * later, but we'll come back to what the different uses of the * means, but for now I claim conceptually it just means swap has access to the locations of its parameters.
的确,在打印资料中的swap被定义为,携带*a和*b,之后它也是带*号的,但是我们将说明*的不同用法,现在,我断言swap可以,使用参数的地址。
应用推荐