-
It is not in the least to assert that no references may be distorted if advantage can thereby gained.
并不是为了能得到好处,而说所有的参考都是真实的。
-
Oh! I'm not supposed to do that. When mom or dad says no, it means no."
噢！我不应该那样做。
当妈妈或爸爸说‘不’的时候，就是‘不’。”
-
So, I don't even have to worry because you're not writing this down, so I can just fix it when I post the notes and no one will ever know, except that this is not OpenCourseWare.
所以我甚至不用担心,因为你们不会把这个写下来，所以我可以在我给出讲义的时候再修改,而且不会有人知道，但除非这不是公开课。
-
No. She works for a company, so it's not that hard.
不担心，她在一家公司上班，所以不是那么困难。
-
And, in fact, it kind of looks like a function, and yet here's a semicolon I just said that can get you into trouble, and yet that's not actually a function, because there's no interesting lines of code, because it turns out the interesting code is down here at the bottom.
实际上，它有点像一个函数，并且这里有一个能够使你陷入麻烦当中的分号,那个事实上也不是一个函数，因为这里没有有用的代码，因为,有用的代码都在底端。
-
It's not uninteresting, I think, to note that there appears to be absolutely no evidence whatsoever available to John Milton that Homer was either vegetarian or a lifelong celibate.
我认为这很有趣，似乎没有什么证据证明,弥尔顿可以获知,荷马要么是素食主义者或者是独身。
-
You might think the answer to that is no if we are physicalists but in fact it's not so clear the answer is no.
如果我们是物理主义者你可能认为,人不可能肉体不死,但其实答案没有那么明确。
-
Is that right? So no: to say it another way, middle is not a best response to any belief I can hold about the goal keeper, to any belief.
我说的没错吧,或者换个说法,从中路射门无论在何种信念下,都不是一个最佳对策
-
That's no random assignment; it's not an experiment.
没有随机安排;,不满足实验的条件。
-
The northern states by the Antebellum Period 1820s,1830s,1840s-- was beginning to sort of hurtle toward a different future than what that slave society was perhaps--no, not really slowly it too was hurtling toward a certain future.
北方在战前,也就是19世纪20至40年代,就急速开始朝着,和奴隶社会完全不同的方向发展,但是南方奴隶社会的发展得也不是很慢,它也在飞驰向一个确定的未来
-
People enjoy that in ways that Iser may not be fully acknowledging in this argument, but there's no question that it doesn't involve the violation of expectations.
人们很开心地看到，从某种程度上伊瑟尔可能,没有在他的论点中完全承认，但是毫无疑问,论点中并没有期望的违背。
-
I have some people that say I am not doing this well, oh, forget it. No, keep going.
有些人说我这样做不好，哦，忘了吧，不，继续。
-
It's not a valid experiment if it has no chance of showing that my hypothesis is flawed.
如果根本没可能证明我的假设,是有瑕疵的，那么这个试验。
-
It was not their IQs that made no difference whatsoever to their long-term success.
不是他们的智商，智商对导致他们长期成功的因素没有影响。
-
So, that is a tricky problem to begin with because if you take this formula here, it tells you y if you know t, but no, we're not saying that.
以这个问题刚开始的时候有点难度,因为如果你要用这个公式,求y的时候就一定要知道t,但是,我们不知道
-
NO So that the more complete answer to the question is that no, we're never going to be able to observe that because of the uncertainty principle it's not possible to observe a velocity that's this slow for a macroscopic object.
所以这个问题的完整答案是，由于不确定性原理,我们不可能测量到这么慢的,宏观物体的速度，希望这个解释。
-
Another side effect if you take too much lithium is death, so that's no good to have in sodas either, and it might not have been as big a deal back in the 1920's, but you can imagine with supersizing today, this might be a bigger problem.
另一个副作用是因为摄入锂过量而死，这更说明在汽水里放这种东西是不好的，这在二十世纪二十年代可能没什么大问题，但你可以想象在如今这个什么都超标的时代，这也许会出更大的问题。
-
Couldn't it still be the case that as long as we take into account the importance of getting the right kinds of pleasures, then really pleasure is what it's all about and all that it's about? No, I think that's still not right.
它还说得通吗？,当我们考虑,正确的快乐的重要性时，那才是真正的快乐,而且仅为快乐？，不，我认为那还是不对。
-
One of the reasons why the Milgram experiment is so nice to know is that if this ever happens to you, not as an experiment but in real life, it will no longer be new to you.
其中一个原因,为什么我们都应该知道米尔格林姆实验,就是如果这种情况发生在你身上，我不是说实验，而是在现实生活中，你不再对这种情况一无所知。
-
If it were linear, which 32% of you seem have thought, that would have meant that our Lewis structure had no lone pairs in it, right, and that's not the case.
如果是直线，就像32%的同学认为的那样，这意味着Lewis结构里没有孤对,对吧，这是不可能的。
应用推荐