It seemed to me as though no one would ever quote Horace again, as anything but a lie. Of course that's not the case.
对我而言尽管没有人会再援引贺拉斯,除了这个谎话,当然那不能说明什么。
And so I asked again, and she said no.
我再一次向她请求,但她还是拒绝了。
Again, there's no advertising affecting this, there's no parents being irresponsible and buying sugary cereals for the poor little animals.
此外,这个结果并不受广告营销的影响,也不因为有父母不负责任,给这个可怜的小动物买高糖的谷物
How many people abstained? Not allowed to abstain: let's try it again. Alpha in this case? No abstentions here.
多少人弃权了,不带弃权的,再举一次,多少人选α,不能弃权
Gosh, the answer to that is, again, duh! No. You couldn't possibly survive your death, given the very definition.
答案当然是,不可能,你不可能死后逃生,这是毋庸置疑的
There can be no such thing as an unjust law, he infers, again, because the sovereign is the source of all justice.
而且这世上不可能有不公正的法律,因为君主就是,一切正义与公平的裁定者。
Stack of size 4, again I'm going there, so I'm going to do this initially, no I'm not, I'm going to start again.
同样的,移动上面四个圆盘,同样也是。
I'd like to go by climbing a birch tree, And climb black branches up a snow-white trunk toward heaven, till the tree could bear no more, But dipped its top and set me down again.
我真想去爬白桦树,沿着雪白的树干,爬上乌黑的树枝,爬向那天心,直到树身再支撑不住,树梢碰着地,把我放下来。
And again, the answer seems to be "no."
答案同样是否定的“
Again,no difference.
同样没有区别。
No divine evil agents. Again, in the pagan worldview the primordial womb spawns all sorts of beings, all kinds of divinities, good and evil that are in equal strength.
没有带有灵力的邪恶化身,同时,在异教的世界观中,万物孕育于一个原始的发源地,所有的神,善神和恶神,都具有相同的能力。
Again, don't worry about it. Velazquez, who died in 1610, I think. No, it's 1660, sorry.
我想他去世于1661年,哦不,是1660年,抱歉
Oddly, it's much more like going to a jazz concert where the audience is sitting maybe around tables or something like that and encouraging and interacting with the performers but again in those cultures no notation.
非常奇怪,这很像爵士音乐会的场面,观众们为鼓励演奏者而围坐在桌边,或围着别的什么的,并和演奏者积极互动,而这些文化中都没有记谱法
I was just finding very tunnel vision-like, the smallest elements at that moment in time which means I don't know anything about the other elements other than they are not the smallest and so no matter what with Selection Sort I had to repeat this again and again and again and if you do out the math it's roughly N squared steps in the worst case as well.
我只有一个狭窄的视野,只知道某时刻的最小元素,就意味着我并不知道其他元素的任何情况,只知道它们不是最小的,所以不管怎样,在选择排序中,我就得一遍一遍地重复选择过程,在最坏情况下,大概需要N的平方次比较。
The emphasis on the individual is just another way of saying, again unlike Aristotle, that no one has natural authority over anyone else.
个体的重点在于,与亚里士多德所说不同,没有人拥有高于他人的自然权威。
So once again, no abstentions this time: who would choose Alpha? Let's have a show of hands again, keep your hands up a second.
这次也不允许弃权,谁会选择α,请举下手,先别放下手
In any event, this is some interesting research opportunity, so again, no obligation, you don't have to do this, I won't even know if you are or not, but I just thought I would present these in the case you might find them interesting things to do.
不管怎样,这都是些不错的研究机会,不过不是强制的,我甚至都不知道你们参加与否,不过我还是会把这些放在这里,这样大家可能会找到一些有趣的事情去做
This is again the sort of existential condition in which Hobbes wants to put us in the state of nature and all the benefits he lists there, he enumerates, that are denied to us in such a condition, again no knowledge, no geography, no cultivation of the earth, no navigation or building.
这也是霍布斯,把我们置于自然状态,和他列举的益处的,现存状态中,在这种状态中,否认知识,地理,土地栽培,航海和舒适建筑的存在。
Because, again, it seems simpler have a model where there's no momentum.
因为没有momentum的话会更简单,我现在第一次运行。
应用推荐