Nina's version of communication was, "I'm going to Bourne Ultimatum."

妮娜的回答很干脆,我会去看《谍影重重》

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So Nina's preferences are Player 1's preferences here.

妮娜的偏好就是参与人1的偏好

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Both people would rather be at an equilibrium than to be mal-coordinated or uncoordinated, but Player 1 wants to go to Bourne ultimatum and Player 2 wants to go to Good Shepherd, and actually I thought Nina's strategy there was pretty good.

每个参与人都觉得达成均衡,总比协调失败要好得多,但是参与人1想看《谍影重重》,而参与人2想看《特工风云》,我觉得妮娜的策略很好

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选