4 So this is 16 times 4 equals 64 and though this is not proof by any means, it's not a formal proof because here is one example that happens to prove my point.
所以是16*4,即,尽管如此,这并不是严格的证明,因为是这个例子碰巧证明了我的观点。
We're looking for trends. Obviously, if your aggregate score is 75, you're passed.But, 0 I'm looking at what's going on in the vicinity of 50 because I don't think my point scheme is that accurate.
很明显我们在寻找发展动态,如果你的总分是75分,你就通过了,但是,我在寻找50分左右的同学的发展动态0,因为我不认为我的分值安排是正确的。
I could have that path be very slow and steady, so that at every point along the way, my gas is an equilibrium.
我可以很慢,很稳定地经过这条路径,因此在这条路径上的任意一点,气体都处于平衡态。
There's different theories about why, but my point right now is simply that people don't necessarily know this but still they're subject to this.
有很多不同的理论对这种现象进行了解释,不过现在我的看法是,人们并不理解这种现象,但却仍然会这样去做。
And it speaks to what I said is my concern that Child Main Nutrition decrease by only 1 percentage point while economy cotinues to...grow -I see.
这也是我提过的我所关心的问题,经济还在高速增长的同时,儿童营养满足率,却掉了1个百分点,-我知道。
It used to be the case that-- well I mean my guess is that very few of you probably go through a day without interacting with a water bottle at some point.
以前的情况是,我是说,我猜在座很少有人经历过,一整天不带水壶的日子
Usually it's not. That was the point that discussed in my chapter comparing him to Houston's film The Dead. Houston's film is filled with sentimentality and nostalgia. Welles generally avoids that, the way James Joyce does.
通常并非如此,那正是我在比较,他的作品与休斯顿的电影《死魂灵》,的章节中所谈到的,休斯顿的电影,充满了多愁善感和怀旧情绪,而威尔斯通常,尽量避免那样做,那是詹姆斯·乔伊斯的方式。
Let me read you a quick excerpt by Abraham Maslow who talks about this approach, "If one took a course or picked up a book on the psychology of learning, most of it, in my opinion, would be beside the point - that is, beside the 'humanistic' point.
我来给你们读一小段Abraham,Maslow的话,“如果有人上了一门关于心理学学习的课,或者看了一本这方面的书,大部分内容,在我看来,是与重点无关的-,也就是,与人性无关。
No, so, my point is that I want you to succeed, and I know you can succeed.
不,我的意思是,我希望你们成功,我知道你们能够办到。
应用推荐