It vaults that discussion into a much larger, metaphysical, transcendent context, the whole order of the universe.

也将这个讨论深入到了一个,更加广大，形而上的，超越上下文的全宇宙秩序的范畴。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

It's much larger than a bacterium, it's ten to 30 microns let's say instead of one to two microns, so almost ten times bigger.

人类细胞比细菌大得多,有十到三十微米那么大而不是一两微米,几乎大了十倍

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

The first, which I just stated, is that the deflection of that negative particle was just far and away more extreme, much, much larger than that of the positive particle. The other assumption that he made here is that the charge on the two particles was equal.

为了这么做，他又做了更多的观察,首先，像我之前已经说了，测到的负电粒子,偏转要远远,大于正电粒子,另外一个他做了一个假设。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

The kind of feeling that he wants us to have is sort of stated in that alternate ending, but "The Horror and the Glory" shows how that kind of feeling enters in to a much larger cultural analysis.

在后来被换掉,的结尾有提到，但“恐惧与荣耀“中讲述了,如何以那种感觉进入更广泛的文化分析。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

Or Roosevelt, after World War Two, talking about our humility as a nation in the face of the sacrifice of our soldiers, or Lincoln, or Washington, These are people who understood that they were small parts of something much larger.

第二次世界大战之后，罗斯福总统，也讲过一个国家的谦逊,面对战士的牺牲，无论是林肯还是华盛顿，这些人都很请楚,他们都只是很渺小的一部分。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

And again, to move back and ask ourselves a larger question, would knowing how much time you have be something that would allow you to actually embrace those choices, ? or would it instead just be a burden?

再一次，回到原题，问我们自己一个更大的问题，知道自己还有多少时间,是会让你实际上接受这些选择呢，还是只是一个负担？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So if you go back to Eisenhower, for instance, he said anyone who had seen the sacrifice and the blood of his friends has got to be humble, has got to understand humility, s something so much larger than we are.

如果回到艾森豪威尔时期，他说任何人,凡是见过朋友牺牲流血,都必须谦逊，都必须理解为何谦逊，因为相对而言，我们很渺小，because，it’

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选