So Alpha does better. But if my pair chooses Beta, then Alpha gets me -1; Beta gets me 1.
此时选α较好,但是如果我对手选β,我选α得-1,选β得1
I'm averaging it over the entire set of valence electrons which gives me 1.91 MJ per mole.
我是在整个价电子的集合上作平均,最后得到1。91兆焦每摩尔。
But please try and look at--somebody's not looking at it, because they're using it as a fan here-- So look at Game 1 and fill out that form for me, okay?
请大家看下游戏1 我知道有人没看,他们用那张纸扇风呢,快浏览下游戏1 然后填完 好吗
It costs me 1/.
我要花1/英镑
6 Well again, we can go to our ones column, twos, four, eight, 16, 2 damn, 32. So we can go to 32 128 and then we can go to 64, and then 128, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 and this gives me 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.
好吧,再一次回到一位,二位,四位,八位,该死的,32,等等,所以我们可以找到32位2,再64,然后,那么我们就有了。
Remember what range does, it gives me a set or a collection or a tuple of integers from 0 up to 1 - is the last value, so it's going to give me everything from 0 up to the total number of heads.
我将要在这个循环范围内加上鸡的数量,记住循环范围的目的,它给了我一个从一开始的整数集合,或者数组,这是最后的值。
He greets his former rival and enemy with these words 1 This is in Genesis 33:10-11 If you would do me this favor, accept for me this gift, for to see your face is like seeing the face of God, And you have received me favorably.
他用以下的话来迎接往昔的仇敌,这段话出现在《创世纪》10章第10到11节中1,不然,我若在你眼前蒙恩,就求你从我手里收下这礼物,因为我见了你的面,如同见了神的面,并且你接纳了我。
Let's take a system. Under constant pressure T1 V1, going to a second -- this is the system, so let me write the system here.
我们建立一个系统1,在恒定的压强T1,V1,下,变成了另一个系统,-这个初始的系统让我把它写在这。
So if I produce one unit it costs me c; if I produce two units it costs me 2c; if I produce 100 units, it'll cost me 100c and if I produce 0.735 units that costs me 0.735c.
生产1单位的产品成本是c,如果生产2单位成本就是2c,如果我生产100单位成本就是100c,如果生产0.735单位就是0.735c
And frankly it would be incredibly time-consuming and tedious for me, to count this room full of people old school style-- 1, 2, 3 and so forth.
坦白说,按学校的老办法一个人一个人的数,1个,2个,3个……,对我来说极其费时费力。
Let me generalize this. In this case, my incrementer was just adding 1 to an integer, it's a pretty straightforward thing to do.
当我完成后,我不会再显示任何信息了,好,好,那么你们已经看过两个简单的例子了,让我来讲讲概念,在这个例子中。
*10^-18 1.6 times 10 to the minus 18, excuse me, 6*10^-19 we have 1.6 times 10 to the minus 19, 2.18 times 10 to the minus 18, etc.
。,1。,2。18*10^-18,等等。
For example, I may have someone who promises to pay me $1 in one year or in two years or three years.
举个例子,有人对我承诺,在一年或者两年或者三年内支付我一美元
Let me divide this into 2 lists of size 1 and now done, right?
那么我将其划分为只有1个元素的2个列表?
It means that choosing position 2 always gives me a higher share of the vote than choosing position 1, no matter where the other candidate positions herself.
意味着选择立场2,会比选择立场1,获得更多的选票,无论另一个候选人如何选择
But you'll see that very clearly that Steven's right: that choosing 2 will always get me 5% more of the votes than choosing 1 from here on down.
你会发现斯蒂文说的很对,从这里开始,选立场2总会比,选立场1多获得5%选票
What is Player 1's best response? Someone read it off for me.
谁来说一下,参与人1最佳对策是什么
So this first little piece of code right here says, ok you give me 2 points, I'll create another 1 of these lists and I'll simply take the x, sorry I shouldn't say x, I'm going to assume it's the x, the x-values are the two points, add them together, just right there, the y-values, add them together and return that list.
好,为了来认识到这一点,让我们来看一个简单的小例子,在你们的课堂手册上,你可以看到我写了一个小程序,它假设我得到了,这些点中的一些,我想对它们做一些操作,例如我想把它们加到一起,那么这里的第一小片,代码的意思是,好给我两个点,我会再创建一个数组。
If you want to get some input from the user, my God I don't want to have to program it to low level zero and 1 just to get keys from the keyboard; please let there have been someone who does that for me and indeed there are an increasingly sophisticated options that you can pull off the shelf.
如果你想获得一些用户的输入数据,我的上帝,我可不希望在键盘上敲入0,1的低水平方式来编程;,希望有个人能帮我做这件事吧,但是现有的选择,也变得日益复杂了。
Exactly, so ignoring these first two positions which were a bit weird, choosing 2 always gave me 5% more votes than choosing 1, regardless of what the other person chooses.
完全正确,所以忽略前两个立场,因为前两个立场有点古怪,我们选立场2总比1多获得5%的选票,无论对手如何选择
So where is--suppose he's pricing-- We'll say the prices are between 0 and 1, suppose he's pricing at .8, what would be a good price for me to set?
如果他定价,假设他的价格,取值在0和1之间,假设他的价格设定在0.8,我应该设定哪个价格比较好呢
Let's just... We'll get there, just to remind you, the way we read this is you give me a quantity of Firm 2, I find Firm 1's best response by going across to the pink line and dropping down.
我们当然也能算出来,提醒一下各位,这个图像的个意思是任意给出公司2产量,然后通过这条粉色的线,就可找出与之对应的公司1的最佳对策
I should have done this earlier by typing the Cartesian form earlier, so let me go back to where I was, sorry for that, let me go make this a 1 again.
我应该早点通过输入笛卡尔形式,来说明这个的,那么让我回到刚才说到的地方,很抱歉,让我去把,这个a,1再做一遍。
I going to come back in a second to how it actually does that, but it basically says, get me x value for p 1, get me the x value for p 2, compare them, just as you would normally.
是一个类的实例,我要去取的这个实例,所关联的x值,我稍后会讲讲实际上,这里是怎么实现的,但是基本上它的意思就是,给我p1的x值。
It tells me that the best response to S2 is the ?1 that solves this equation, that solves this first order condition.
我们得出S2的最佳对策是?1,?1是这个方程的解,它满足一阶条件
Remember last time, we wrote this simple piece of code to print out even or odd. If, you know, x, 1 it was in fact, even or odd. So let me show you what a flow chart for that would look like, because I want to make a comparison point here.
这就像这里有一些脚蹼一样,首先进行测试,然后把球这样放来让ANS加,然后回来继续测试,最终跳出循环然后打印答案。
same point It says, if you give me two of these data objects, I'm going to call them p 1 and p 2.
的代码,What,does,it,say,to,do?,你可以看看它,它是用来做什么的呢?,它的意思是,如果你给我两个。
The way we read this green graph is you give me a choice of Firm 1, q1.
这条绿色的线表示,任意给出公司1的产量q1
What's that telling me is that if Player 2 chooses not to produce then Player 1's best response is a - c over 2b.
参与人2产量为0而参与人1最佳对策是,/2b,这能说明什么
应用推荐