Zero profits, I'll make zero profits, so that certainly is a best response, pricing at marginal cost as well.

零利润,我将没有利润,所以这确实是一个最佳对策,也定价在边际成本

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Suppose Firm 1 is pricing at marginal cost and Firm 2 is pricing at something higher, a little bit higher.

假设公司1定价在边际成本,公司2定价稍微高点,高一点点

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And I think it made a marginal but real contribution to the possibility of normalization of relations there.

我觉得我们的贡献不大，但实实在在,帮助实现了两国的重新建交。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

It's important--that's one reason why we want policies that encourage equality of incomes-- not necessarily equality, but reasonable equality-- because the people with very low wealth have a very high marginal utility of income and people with very high wealth have very little.

这非常重要,我们需要通过政策,来引导收入公平的一个原因就是这个,不是绝对的平等,是相对的平等,因为那些低收入的人群,对收出的边际效应相当的高,而高收入人群的则小得多

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

So for those people who took Intro Economics, which is most of you, this is a game, this a setting in which we have constant marginal costs.

大多数学过经济学导论的同学都知道,这里的边际成本是一个常数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Suppose Firm 1 is pricing at marginal cost is this a Nash Equilibrium?

假设公司1定价在边际成本,这是纳什均衡吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If Firm II is charging C, Then a best response for Firm 1 is to set price equal to marginal costs, and if Firm 1 is pricing at marginal cost, then conversely a best response for Firm 2 is to price at marginal cost.

如果公司2选择了C,公司1的最佳对策是,定价在边际成本,如果公司1定价在边际成本,同样的,公司2的最佳对策,也是定价在边际成本

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选