I don't believe that markets are efficient and it doesn't really seem like it should be an open question.
我不相信市场是有效的,而且事实上这似乎,也不应该是一个开放式的问题。
it should not just be geared toward people that are like, tall, thin, obviously beautiful,
不应该仅仅定位于那些高、瘦、明显漂亮的人,
Does it follow from that that their experiences should not be taken as evidence of what the afterlife is like?
难道这就意味着,他们的经验不能成为证据证明,来生是什么样的吗
So it should be something like one, a, two.
因此我已经有了预期的正确答案。
If you walk into a class with 5th graders, who on day one are years behind where they should be and hate school and are kind of like to hate you because of it.
如果你走进一个五年级教室,学生们从第一天开始就落后很多,恨学校,因此也恨你。
So, I think that kind of thing. You should read that poem : Student: I like the line where it's if you can be in a crowd but not lose the common touch -that's my favorite line Mr. Carl Icahn: That's right. If you can walk in a crowd and still not lose the--if you can walk with kings and not lose the common touch.
所以为这些事情你应该读读那首诗,学生:我喜欢这句,如果你跟村夫交谈而不变谦虚之,态,亦或与王侯散步而不露谄媚之颜,那是我最喜欢的一句,卡尔·伊坎先生:对,是的,如果你可以和农夫交谈而,不变--亦或与王侯散步,而不露谄媚之颜。
I feel like there should be more diversity in it, in a sensee that
我觉得应该更多样化,而这意思是指在有些方面,
That means, when I take two derivatives, I want to get a, then you should know enough calculus to know it has to be something like at^, and half comes from taking two derivatives.
也就是说,当我想求二阶导时,得到了a,你应该有足够的微积分知识,才能知道必须有类似at^的项,而这个1/2则是因为求了两次导数
应用推荐