• So Sarna and other scholars hold that the patriarchal traditions are not entirely fabricated retrojections from a later period.

    所以Sarna和其他学者相信,族长传统,不完全是后世臆造的产物。

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • Now,I understand that probably the majority of scholars would say,"No. It comes from a later period."

    现在大多数学者会说,“不,它形成于更晚的时期“

    耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

  • Wouldn't a later writer have cleaned up this ancestral record if this were in fact something composed at a later period? Also, he notes that the representation of inter-ethnic relationships in the patriarchal stories does not accord with the reality of a later period.

    后世的作者难道不会把祖先不光彩的记录抹去吗,如果事实上这故事是后来创作的话?同时,他还提出,宗族故事中所展示的种族间关系,与后世的现实是不相一致的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • If you looked later, as the antibody production response matures, some IgG is produced so that in the late period after initial priming you'd have a mixture of IgM and IgG in the blood.

    如果你稍后再观察,等到产生抗体的应答趋于成熟后,就会产生一些IgG抗体,在初次免疫的最终阶段,你的血液中有IgM,和IgG两种抗体

    耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

  • He's a standard literary device that you see in fables of this period, and later--the kind that you find for example in the fables of Aesop.

    它只是当时在传说中,不可缺少的角色,你可以在随后的伊索寓言中,找到类似的例子。

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • Then on the other hand, at the other extreme, you have scholars who see the patriarchal stories as entirely fabricated retrojections of a much later age. And they vary significantly as to when they think these stories were written: anywhere from the period of the monarchy all the way down to the fourth century, some of them.

    另一方面又是另一个极端,有学者认为族长故事完全是后世编造的,这样一来,对这些故事是什么时候写的,也有巨大的分歧:,其中一些人认为是在从君主制时期,到公元4世纪之间的某段时候。

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定