So Sarna and other scholars hold that the patriarchal traditions are not entirely fabricated retrojections from a later period.
所以Sarna和其他学者相信,族长传统,不完全是后世臆造的产物。
Now,I understand that probably the majority of scholars would say,"No. It comes from a later period."
现在大多数学者会说,“不,它形成于更晚的时期“
Wouldn't a later writer have cleaned up this ancestral record if this were in fact something composed at a later period? Also, he notes that the representation of inter-ethnic relationships in the patriarchal stories does not accord with the reality of a later period.
后世的作者难道不会把祖先不光彩的记录抹去吗,如果事实上这故事是后来创作的话?同时,他还提出,宗族故事中所展示的种族间关系,与后世的现实是不相一致的。
If you looked later, as the antibody production response matures, some IgG is produced so that in the late period after initial priming you'd have a mixture of IgM and IgG in the blood.
如果你稍后再观察,等到产生抗体的应答趋于成熟后,就会产生一些IgG抗体,在初次免疫的最终阶段,你的血液中有IgM,和IgG两种抗体
He's a standard literary device that you see in fables of this period, and later--the kind that you find for example in the fables of Aesop.
它只是当时在传说中,不可缺少的角色,你可以在随后的伊索寓言中,找到类似的例子。
Then on the other hand, at the other extreme, you have scholars who see the patriarchal stories as entirely fabricated retrojections of a much later age. And they vary significantly as to when they think these stories were written: anywhere from the period of the monarchy all the way down to the fourth century, some of them.
另一方面又是另一个极端,有学者认为族长故事完全是后世编造的,这样一来,对这些故事是什么时候写的,也有巨大的分歧:,其中一些人认为是在从君主制时期,到公元4世纪之间的某段时候。
应用推荐