So the Hyksos theory is one that got people very excited for a while, but is really not well supported.
因此希克索斯理论能让人兴奋一阵子,但是并没有得到很好的证实。
It's expensive to live in New York, so a lot of people are wealthy, but not everybody is. I'm not.
在纽约安家是非常昂贵的,因此一定有许多有钱人,但不是每个人都是有钱人。我就不是。
This is really, I think, a radical if not heretical idea for the national poet of a Christian people.
我真的觉得这是,激进的,甚至是异端邪说,对一个基督教国家的诗人来说。
What would happen is there would be a panic; " people would say they're not paying on the notes.
这会导致恐慌的发生;,人们会说:“银行没有兑现纸币。
The Faith Council in my view is not a group of people who come together and pontificate several times a year and put a sheet for the President at the end of the year.
在我看来,信仰委员会不是,一群人聚在一起,一年发表几次高论,然后在年末呈交给总统一页纸。
Would it be better for people to be able to see everyone and maybe not feel like this is a secure environment in which they can share their interests and what they thought and what they care about?
我们可以选择,将用户信息全部公开,但在这样一个网络环境下,分享自己的所见所闻,所感所想,总会让人觉得不可靠?
because you read the Bill of Rights, for example, The Declaration of Independence, citizens have a duty to put a new government if it is not serving well the people.
举个例子,如果你读《人权法案》,或者《独立宣言》,如果政府不够尽责,公民有权支持一个新的政府。
So this is not a very positive sign and people are having a bad relationship with food.
这不是个正面的信号,人们和食物之间的关系变糟
By the way, that is a subtle thing people may not have realized.
顺便说一下有一个人们不曾发觉的微妙细节
How is this determined? And Hobbes makes clear that the sovereign is not invested with the authority to exercise a kind of absolute control over everything that people do.
它是怎么确定的呢,霍布斯阐释说,君主并非要用自己的权力,对人民做的所有事情都拥有绝对的控制。
He is at war and he is serving under a commander, and so the behavior of these people towards one another is not precisely like what it would be.
他们乐于战斗并服从命令,这种特殊的主从的关系,和我们所想象的完全不同
Hunger is not essentially a message to other people but when humans when it involves a loud noise the reason why we've evolved loud noises is to communicate with other people.
饥饿不是一个传达给别人的信息,但人类会发出很大的声音,我们为什么会进化出很大的声音,就是为了与人沟通。
Neither it is a negative sum game-- it's not that my happiness takes away from other people's happiness which will be a negative sum game: if I have more, you'll necessarily have less.
也不是负和游戏-,我的快乐不是从别人那里夺来,那将是负和游戏:,我有更多,你一定更少。
So if we know people are not going to play a best response that's never a best response, and we know if we people are not going to play something which is never a best response, and we know people are not going to play which is not a best response, which is not a best etc., etc., etc.
如果我们知道人们不会采用最佳对策,说错了,是不会采用非最佳对策,如果我们知道人们不会采用,非最佳对策的策略,就知道人们不会采用非最佳对策的策略,以此类推了
Okay, this one, I believe that there is not a debt to society in the sense that how did these people become wealthy?
好的,对这个问题,我认为从他们变富的方式来看,他们并不欠社会的?
What I strive for is say something new and different, not to reiterate people, in the sense of giving them a kind of textbook, clarification or introduction.
我所追求的,是一些新的,不同寻常的东西,而不是去重复别人的话,给他们一本教材,一种阐述或是介绍。
应用推荐