Why don't we give Philip both the matching pair and give you each a pair of socks since he didn't get to wear this one, they are brand new, in fact, and a big round of applause for what I'm sure is a little difficult.
我们为什么不给飞利浦一双配对的袜子,给你们每人一双袜子,他还没穿这双袜子,所以这双还算是全新的,再次以热烈的掌声对他们表示感谢,这样的模仿还是有一些难度的。
In fact, your socks don't even match.
实际上,你的袜子都不是成对的一双。
But here, as we saw in week zero with the shoe example putting on socks, I have to increment this variable explicitly myself.
但是这里,像我们上周看到的,鞋子穿在袜子上,我需要亲自明确地增加这个变量。
And here in the middle of the page a little ways down: My love's striped black-and-white cotton frock, jaunty blue cap, white socks and brown moccasins were not quite in keeping with the large, beautifully cut aquamarine on a silver chainlet which gemmed her throat, a spring rain gift from me.
在这一页中间偏下的地方:,我的小情人穿着黑白条子的棉布裙,带着鲜艳的蓝色帽子,白袜子和亮皮鞋与她脖子上那条优美的,蓝宝石项链有些不协调,这是由于那场春雨我送给她的礼物。
In Philip's case, we ask the question, does he have zero or none zero socks on his feet?
在飞利浦这个例子中,我们就需要判断,他的脚上有没有袜子?
So here is an example of socks on feet being 0 the number of socks on Philip's feet which is in fact 0.
因此这里有个袜子在脚上的例子,在飞利浦脚上的袜子数量实际上是。
Last week we did the socks thing and that was in pseudocode.
上周我们写了一个socks程序,但那只是伪代码。
And then on the right hand side I++, we saw that in pseudocode with our socks example last week that just says increment I.
然后是最右边的i++,我们上周在socks例子的伪代码中,曾经见到过,不是么?只是代表i加1而已。
应用推荐