• The confusion, the mistake I think people are making when they make this argument, the mistake I think they're making is this.

    我觉得人们提出这个论点的时候,产生的困惑和错误,我认为他们犯的错如下。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • It's a common mistake to make if you forget that I've actually declared that variable up top, but wait a minute, I know any time that I use a variable, I have to declare it.

    这是一个通常犯的错误,如果你忘了,之前在前面已经声明了这个变量,等等,我知道在任何时候,我使用一个变量,我必须声明它。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • And you will be invited to make that mistake on an exam, I'm sure.

    我相信在考试中你们有人肯定,会犯这样的错误。

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • It's a mistake I've learned that I make.

    看这就是一个我学习到的错误。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Now the part about his life in Chicago was I'm going to keep doing this, call it the novel versus the autobiography, and I'll explain why I make that mistake a little later--it was cut from the autobiography.

    他在芝加哥的生活那部分,我会一直把这书叫做小说,而不是自传,我之后会解释为什么犯这样的错误,这书是从自传的一部分。

    耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

  • So the best response for Player 1, as a function of what Player 2 chooses, q2, is just equal to the q1 hat in this expression and if I solve that out carefully, I will no doubt make a mistake, but let's try it.

    这个就是参与人1的最佳对策,它是参与人2策略q2的一个函数,它和之前的q1帽那个表达式是相等的,虽然我是很仔细地计算的,还是有可能算错的,我来验证一下

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • I think we can make the mistake, thinking about autobiography, that it's somehow not literary. But in fact it's very literary, and part of what makes it literary is the fact that you have to choose what scenes go into that narrative.

    我觉得我们可以犯这个错误,想想自传,从某种程度上说它不是文学,但事实上它很文学,其中一个原因是你选择加入叙述的那些场景。

    耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

  • This is a mistake I make all the time in Python.

    在编写Python语言的时候我总是犯这个错误。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定