All right. I tried it on 2, I surely didn't expect a precise and exact answer to that but I got something, and if you square this, you'll find the answer kept pretty darn close to 2.

好，我试试求2的平方根,我当然不希望得到一个完全准确的答案了,但是我得到了一个近似值，试试将这个数平方一下,你会发现结果和2相当接近。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Maybe I can help you find the answer if we talk about it a little bit longer.

要是我们多讨论一会儿的话，也许我能帮你找到答案。

Do you 实战 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

I don't find that my analysis is profound in the final answer, I just took some estimates using my data and, again, we could-- if someone wanted to argue with us they could argue with my estimates of the expected returns of the standard deviations and the covariances, but not with this theory.

我在计算过程中并没有做太深入的分析，我只是用我的数据做了一下大概的估计,我再说一次，我们可以-,如果有人想就这个问题与我们争辩,他们可以争论我对期望收益的估计,或是争论标准差和协方差的估计值，但并不会针对理论本身。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

I know this is the right answer, because if I now find the acceleration, I find it's mg divided by m and I get -g as the answer for all bodies.

我知道这个等式是正确的,因为现在如果我要求物体的加速度,用 mg 除以 m,我就得到 -g,这个结果对所有物体都成立

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选