If I'm anonymous, it's not me and I could do terrible things without feeling the same moral responsibility.
如果我是匿名的,那我就不是我了,我就能干坏事,而不用感到有道德责任。
Or you could also use the "I have" pattern negatively to show that you do not possess something.
当然,你也可以用“I have”句型的否定形式来表示你并没有某些东西。
So I could do it empirically, but I don't want to do that typically, it's just not a great way to get at it. And so in fact, what we want is exactly what the young lady said.
我可以凭借经验来做,但是我不想那么来,因为那并不是一种好方法,并且实际上,我们想要的和这位年轻女士说的确实相同。
So, for example, there's a magician-- The question is not, could I explain to you how the seance manages to do the amazing things that it does?
比如说,有一个魔术师,问题不在于,我能否给你解释通灵任何,做到这些惊人事情的
.. I guess, unfortunately, it is for... there needs to be a number put somewhere, like, I'm not sure what that number would be, but I do agree that there could possibly be a number put on the human life.
我觉得,不幸的是。,有时确实需要标价,不过我不确定具体数字,但我确实认同,人的生命也许可以被标价。
Now I could go through again and do exactly the same thing for Player II, but I'm not going to do that because everything's symmetric.
如果我照此计算同理可得参与人II的,我就不算了,因为都是对称的
I don't have to go read what it printed out in the screen. This has returned a value that I can use. Because I could do a test to say, is this a return value? If it's not, I'll do something else with it. So the binding is still there, it simply doesn't print it out.
我不想读到屏幕中打印出来的这行字,程序返回过一个我能够使用的值,因为我可以做个小测试,来说明这是否是返回的值,如果不是,我可以做一些其它的事,而这个绑定依然在这儿,没有打印任何东西。
If not, what could I do?
好,我可以先看看这个元素的值?
So here I have a new expression for Firm 1's profit and I could do the same for Firm 2, but I'm not going too because it's... I'm getting bored.
这就是公司1的利润表达式,接下来我们算公司2的,我就不算了,太没有意思了
You could put everything on this line, I think there may be, I'm not really allowed to do this on this model, the one thing I can't do is, part of the truth is that Bud Light might be down here somewhere but I'm not allowed to do that.
你可以把任何东西放在这条线上,我想那也许是,我实际上并没有权利在这个模型中这么做,我不能做的是,起码百威淡啤酒应该在这上的某个位置,但我没权利这么做
应用推荐