Right. I would say as I reflect back on my college experiences and those listening in the audience should know, I graduated from college 45 years ago.

的确如此，可以这么说,当我回想我的大学生活的时候,想必听众中有人知道，我45年前就从大学毕业了。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

The strategies that are less than 67 but bigger than 45, I think these strategies are not, they're not dominated strategies in the original game.

对于选择大于45而小于67的数,我认为他们并不是,在原博弈中并不是劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

When I started in 1985, the distribution to the operating budget was $45 million.

我1985年开始管理耶鲁基金时,运营预算是4千5百万美元

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

And I'm also like everybody else on emails; and I'll get your emails, panic emails at 3:10 in the morning and I'll reply at 4:45. So, it goes like that.

电子邮件我和其他人一样,我会收你们的邮件,早晨3:10紧急邮件,我会在4:45回复,所以就是这样

耶鲁公开课 - 1871年后的法国课程节选

I would say--my personal probability is .45.

我会说,我个人猜想的概率是0.45

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Because I thought everyone was going to be around like the 45 range because 66 is two-thirds, or right around of 100, and they were going to go two-thirds less than that and I did one less than that one.

因为我想每个人都会选45左右的数,因为66约等于一百的2/3,而大家会选比那小的,我就选了更小的数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Notice that once we've deleted the dominated strategies, you know I had said before about four people chose this strategy, and in here, about four people chose this strategy, but in this range 30 through 45, I had lots of people.

注意,一旦我们剔除了劣势策略,我们已知有四人选择了,在45到67之间的数,但是选择30到45的有不少

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So the first argument, that's a straight forward argument, the second argument says, I put myself in other peoples shoes, I realize they're not going to play a dominated strategy, and therefore, having realized they're not going to play a dominated strategy, I shouldn't play a strategy between 45 and 67.

所以第一个过程是直截了当地,而第二个过程,我从别人的角度思考,发现他们并不会选择劣势策略,意识到他们并不会选择劣势策略后,我也不应该选择45至67的数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And there are different choices here 1, 2, 3, and 4 for Player I, and here's the 45o line.

参与人I有1一直到4的可选策略,这条是45°线

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选