The best place to start is, of course, with his views stated in the opening pages of the Politics on the naturalness of the city.
最好的着眼点当然是,从他在《政治学》首页,所提的观点下手,他所谈关于城市的自然状态。
Yet, we should also avoid the second, equally powerful temptation, which is to reject Aristotle out of hand, because his views do not correspond with our own.
另外我们还要避免第二种,同样强大的诱惑,那就是拒亚里士多德于门外,因为他的观点不见容于我们的年代。
He was also--He's also disliked, often hated, because of his views.
他还因其观点而遭到唾弃,受到憎恨。
It's a much more elaborate simile than that: "the broad circumference / hung on his shoulders like the Moon whose Orb / through Optic Glass the Tuscan Artist views.
这是一个更为精细的比喻:,“那个阔大的圆形物/好像一轮挂在他双肩的明月“,/就是那个托斯卡纳的大师“
Right? The state of nature is not seen by him as an actual historical condition in some ways, although he occasionally will refer to what we might think of as anthropological evidence to support his views on the state of nature.
他并不是把自然状态理解为,某种方式的实际的历史性的状态,即使他偶然性地,用人类学的证据,去支持他自然状态的观点。
Are Aristotle's views on democracy correct here in his analysis? Do in fact many chefs make ? for a better dinner than a single chef?
亚里士多德对民主的看法,从他的分析来看,正确吗?多位厨师所准备的,晚餐真的比单一厨师所准备的来的好吗?
应用推荐