And John Gottman does a lot of work--Well, what he does is he looks at film clips of couples.
他做了很多工作,他看夫妻的电影片段。
But Yeats doesn't answer the question, does he? Well, why not?
但叶芝没有回答这个问题,为什么他不回答呢?
Well, I mean, just to defend Locke, he does say that there are some times in which you can't take another person's land.
要为洛克辩护的话,他的确说到了,几种情况下,你不能掠夺他人的土地。
It means by choosing the easy pass, he does at least as well, and sometimes better, than he would have done had he chosen the hard pass.
它意味着选择平坦之途,较选择崎岖之途而言,至少要同样的好,可能还稍微好些
How does he distinguish the well-ordered ? regimes from the corrupt regimes?
他如何区别有条理管治的,政体与腐败的政体?
Well, how does Yeats stand in relation to the events he's describing?
那么,叶芝是怎么处理,他和他所描写的事件的关系的呢?
应用推荐