It turns out that 38% of this bank was owned by the German Government, so it was kind of their problem, right?

最终由德国政府,收购了这家银行38%的股份,所以说这是政府的问题,对吗

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Sure. So the federal government has not taken a lot of action right now.

当然有。联邦政府现在采取的措施并不多。

全球变暖与国力 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

There are critics of Fannie and Freddie who say, the government guarantee doesn't sound right because why is the government guaranteeing a private company?

房利美和房地美的评论家们认为,政府担保听起来有点不对劲,政府为何要担保一个私人企业呢

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

All right, so an elected government can conscript citizens to go out and defend the way of life, the community that makes the enjoyment of rights possible?

好的，所以说民选政府是可以征召公民,上战场为了他们的生活而战的，使得社会能够继续享有这些权利吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

The reason is because marriage right now is something that the government does.

原因就是目前婚姻由政府主管。

发挥创造力的瞬间 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

It's natural in the sense that we have a fundamental unalienable right that there be property, that the institution of property exist and be respected by the government.

自然权利是说财产权是基本的不可剥夺的,正因为它是这样的权利，所以有产权制度存在，并被政府所尊重。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

The government said the private sector, with these kinds of mortgages, is not doing things right; it's not planning for our future in the right way.

政府认为那些私人领域的,抵押贷款公司,做得很糟糕,没有为我们的未来做出正确的规划

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

If the right to private property is natural, not conventional, if it's something that we acquire even before we agree to government, How does that right constrain what a legitimate government can do?

如果私有财产是与生俱来的，而非约定俗成，如果这是在我们同意组建政府前就拥有的，这个权利又如何能限制合法政府的行为呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

It is a right that attaches to individuals as human beings, even before government comes on the scene, even before parliaments and legislatures enact laws to define rights and to enforce them.

这种权利依附于个体而存在，甚至早于任何政府的建立，甚至早在任何议会和立法机关,制定法律定义权利并强制实施前，就已存在。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

I think if you look at conscription as the government picking out certain individuals to go fight in war, then that would be a violation of their natural right to life.

我想如果你把征兵制,视为政府挑选特定的个人去参战，那确实是对自然权利中生命权的侵犯。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

This idea that no law can violate our right to life, liberty, and property would seem to support the idea of a government so limited that it would gladden the heart of the libertarian after all.

任何法律都不能侵犯生命自由和财产权的观点,似乎是支持“有限政府“这一观点的,这点无疑很讨自由主义者欢心。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

How can there be a right to private property even before there is any government?

但私有财产权利怎么能在,政府建立之前就产生呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

I feel like there is a general distinction we made between the right to life that individuals possess and the fact that the government cannot take away a single individual's right to life.

我觉得这两者之间有明显的区别,就是个人所拥有的生命权,以及政府不能夺走,个人生命权的事实。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选