They are amoral, some of them are nicer and better than others But they're not necessarily morally good or righteous.
他们是没有道德原则的,其中一些比另一些和善一点,但他们并没有道德上的美好和正直。
Is this good or not good? "Not good because that means their money,
这样是好还是不好呢?“不好,因为这关乎金钱,
Is it part of your nature to be good or bad or is it largely due to the situation that you fall in?
人性究竟是善还是恶,或者说是否应当更多地归因于所处的环境
Envy is part of human nature-- nothing good or bad about the envy.
嫉妒是人性的一部分-,嫉妒没有好坏之分。
If we look back at that long, open-ended list of things that were good or bad, we'll find that mos of the things on that list are instrumentally good.
再看那个长长的没有结尾的,好的或坏的东西的名单,我们会发现上面很多东西,都是有好的利用价值。
You remember in the first lecture I said there's a difference between the history of criticism and theory of literature, one difference being that the history of criticism has a great deal to do with literary evaluation: that is to say, why do we care about literature and how can we find means of saying that it's good or not good?
你们还记得吗,第一节课我说过,文学评论历史和文学理论有一个重大区别,那就是文学评论的历史,很大程度上与文学评估有关:,意思就是我们为什么要关心文学,还有我们怎么能说一部作品是好还是坏?
and you're asking them questions like, "Is this good or not good?"
你会问一些问题,例如,“这样做是好还是不好?”
if something seems good or bad or whatever.
表示事情的好与坏,或在其他情况下,都可以使用。
Also H&M is good or Forever 21, if you want less expensive clothes.
&M和Forever21价格不贵,也不错。
I suppose to a lesser literacy skill of being a good listener or viewer and have information push condensed.
假设一名优秀的聆听者,或观众需要较少的文化素养,我会将信息压缩。
So would you expect, therefore, as we go across a row for the atomic radius, to increase or to decrease? Good. OK, yes.
那么大家觉得,原子半径沿着某一行向右走,是会增大还是会减小呢?很好,不错,是的。
Could I do more for the ultimate good of the slave population by holding or emancipating what I own?
我是否可以为奴隶的最终利益做的更多,是继续拥有他们,还是解放他们呢
And a large part of being a good programmer, or learning to be a good programmer, is learning how to debug. And it's one of these things where it's harder.
没人能凭本能做好它,如果你相当一名优秀的程序员,或者想通过学习成为一名优秀的程序员,很重要的一部分就是学习怎么去调试。
Why should we weigh all preferences that people have without assessing whether they're good preferences or bad preferences?
为何该同等看待所有偏好,而不区分其好坏呢?
A product like Windows is in a sense only as good as it's last release or two.
如“视窗“一样的产品不过是,和它之前推出的如出一辙而已。
Question, is this amount of work a good amount of work or a bad amount of work?
问题是这个工作量,是不是最优的工作量呢
应用推荐