So, it looks like this is good, because we'll have some separation in terms of not everyone's going to get 100% in terms of recitations here, which is what we're going for.

这看起来挺好的，因为我们总会有些分别,不是每个人都能百分之百做对所有习题%,而让每个人都能做对正是我们所追求的。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Three. Good, so everyone that recognized that probably got the right answer of three angular nodes here.

三，很好，那么知道这一点的同学,应该都得到了正确结果,也就是三个角向节点。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

You just need to be as good as everyone else on the market.

只需做得跟其他供应商一样好即可。

斯坦福公开课 - 百度CEO李彦宏演讲：全球最大搜索引擎的发展课程节选

Great animation but not perhaps a good date movie, so it's gone. Everyone see that?

虽然这部动画很好但显然不适合约会看,把它剔除了,大家都看明白了吧

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Good morning,everyone.

早上好，同学们。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

All right, good job everyone.

好的，大家做的不错。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Everyone got it? Good.

都有是吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So given that we only have one five dollar bill does there have to be one unique winner, and if so, how is that determined if we have multiple people who are That's a good question. If there's multiple winners, we'll divide it but we'll make sure everyone has a positive winning.

现在那里只有一张5美元钞票,是不是说只有唯一的赢家啊,要是这样,怎么确定谁是赢家,好的,要是有多个赢家,我们会平分奖金的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Good, so even if everyone in the number-- everyone in the room didn't choose randomly but they all chose a 100, a very unlikely circumstance, but even if everyone had chosen 100, the highest, the average, sorry, the highest two-thirds of the average could possibly be is 66 2/3, hence 67 would be a pretty good choice in that case.

好的,如果每个人,教室里的每个人不是随机选择数字,而是全选了100,这好像不太可能,但如果每个人真的都选了100,就是最大的书,那平均数,抱歉,平均数的2/3会是66又2/3,此情况下67应该是个不错的选项

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选