And it's this final movement of the simile, according to this ingenious argument by Geoffrey Hartman, that Hartman calls the counter-plot.

根据哈特曼灵巧的论点看来，这就是这个比喻最后的深意，他称之为反计。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

The rhetorical strategy that Milton uses to give us this perspective of eternity is what Geoffrey Hartman called Milton's counter-plot.

弥尔顿习惯于展现给我们的修辞性的手法,这种永恒的看法正是被哈特曼称为,弥尔顿的反策略。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Now you may remember what Geoffrey Hartman had argued that the moon represents the power of divine providence, and there's a lot of ways in which this reading makes sense.

你们可能还记得哈特曼曾经争论过,月亮代表的是神圣的天命的力量，有很多理解这段的方式都是有意义的。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Geoffrey Hartman's theory had a similar tendency to align the poem with a kind of a religious orthodoxy.

哈特曼的理论有着相似的趋势,给这首诗附加上一种宗教上的正统思想。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

So think of the article on Milton's similes by Geoffrey Hartman.

想一想杰弗里哈特曼关于弥尔顿的明喻写的文章。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Next time reread for the third time - you will be repaid by your dedication - Books One and Two, this time focusing on the similes. Also, as I mentioned at the beginning of class, read the essays by Stanley Fish and Geoffrey Hartman.

下次再把这两册书读一遍,你们的付出终将得到回报,第一二册书，这次的重点在明喻上，同时，正如我在课的一开始提到的，看斯坦利·费什和杰弗里·哈特曼写的文章。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

The other great critic of the Miltonic simile for my money takes a completely different tack, and that's Geoffrey Hartman who makes an argument that might even be thought to contradict Fish's argument, although actually Geoffrey Hartman wrote his piece first.

在我看来，另一个对弥尔顿的比喻研究深远的评论家,采取了截然不同的方针，他就是杰弗里哈特曼,他做出了一个被认为是在反驳费什的观点，尽管实际上是哈特曼首先写出了他的观点。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选