As you know from reading your Pairy, the sigh reading has dialogue on personal identity and immortality.
读,野狼战北,这本书,里面提到过关于人格同一性,和永生不死的对话。
Does he hold it out as a real possibility ? or must it be considered a failure in some way or that if the dialogue does end in failure ? what can we learn from that?
他是否坚持真有可能性,或那必需被多少视为是一项失败,如果对话以失败结束,我们又能从中学到什么?
They were accompanied in this dialogue by the TA who came from Sloan, who was a subject expert, and a learning director who came from Merrill Lynch, who was responsible for managing the life of the students and the pressures on them.
在此讨论过程中,有来自Sloan的助教陪同,他是该学科的专家,有来自美林的学习负责人,他负责处理学生的生活,和他们身上的压力。
It seems to be presented entirely innocuously, no one in the dialogue objects to it, yet everything else follows from this idea that the city, the polis, is in the central respect like an individual, like the soul of an individual.
这似乎看起来完全无关紧要,所以对话中的每一个人都不反对,但之后所有的事都慢慢浮现,就从这个概念开始,城市、城邦,重视的核心与个人相同,也像个人的灵魂。
Adeimantus The two brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, whose exchange with Socrates occupies, for the most part, the rest of the dialogue from Book Two onward, the two brothers who, incidentally, are the brothers of Plato.
兄弟檔,Glaucon,和,和苏格拉底的对谈,占据了大部份的对话,从第二部起所有对话,这对兄弟,碰巧是柏拉图的兄弟。
应用推荐