So the status of slave was lowest, ; freed persons was next highest in Roman Law; and free people were next.
所以罗马律法中,奴隶的地位是最低的,然后是自由人;,接着是自由民。
Only in the Roman Empire could slavery actually start being a way that you can move up in society, because you could-- if you were a talented slave, your owner might free you, probably would free you.
只有在罗马帝国,奴隶制可以成为,提高社会地位的手段,因为。。。,如果是一个能干的奴隶,主人可能会释放他,很有可能。
Well Pete, you see, there was this free labor system and this slave labor system," blah-blah blah-blah.
皮特你知道,当时北方是自由劳动制,而南方是奴役劳动制",等等,等等
If slavery is natural, and if nature intends to distinguish the slave from the unfree, the free from the unfree, ? how can nature miss the mark?
如果奴役是自然的演变,而自然倾向于,将奴隶从不自由的人中区别出来,将自由从不自由中区别出来,自然如何会偏离正轨?
The North and the South had roughly, as the Northern and Southern states, the Free states and Slave states, had roughly the same geographic size.
北方和南方大致上,北方和南方的各州有,自由州和蓄奴州的区别,但其地理大小总体上相同
So this maintained, even when-- why would a person free a slave?
这一直保留到。。。,为什么主人要释放奴隶?
But if you're a freedman you're-- the other thing I should tell you is that in Roman law if you're manumitted as a slave, you're made free, if you're manumitted in the normal way they did it, that makes you a Roman citizen, if your owner was a Roman citizen.
但如果你是自由人-,有一点我得解释一下,罗马法律规定,如果奴隶被释放了,如果是正常方法被释放的,他就会成为罗马公民,前提是他的主人是罗马公民。
In a stunning admission, he says, listen to this, that "while nature may intend to distinguish the free man from the slave," he says, "the opposite often results.
听听这一段,精彩的坦承谈话,他说:,“虽然自然可能倾向于,将自由人从奴隶中区别出来,但常是事与愿违。
All tended to have a high slave-to-free ratio of population.
人口中奴隶所占的比例 都是非常高的
In Democracy in America there's that famous passage, or passages, when Tocqueville crosses the Ohio River, from Ohio into Kentucky, from free soil into slave soil, free state into a slave state.
在托克维尔跨越俄亥俄河,从俄亥俄进入到肯塔基州,从自由之所走向奴役之地的那段游历中,为《美国民主》贡献了数段名言
应用推荐