Because he wasn't a very good card player his posse took him for fairly sizable amounts of money.

由于他不是个打牌高手,他的警卫队,把他看作等身的钞票

耶鲁公开课 - 1871年后的法国课程节选

I was a soccer player and I played soccer there for the four years that I was at school.

我是个足球运动员，在大学的四年里一直踢足球。

已经成经济学学徒了 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

So he's really, really short for a basketball player.

所以作为篮球运动员,他又很矮很矮

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

We learned that in this game deleting strategies that are never best response, and then deleting strategies that are never best response to anything that is a best response and so on and so forth, yielded a single strategy for each player.

我们学到了在剔除,非最佳对策的策略后,要再剔除那些在对手最佳对策下,不是最佳对策的策略,以此类推,最后每个参与人都只有一个策略了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

He's a very good player, yeah, but for the first two or three years that he was at United, he hardly played at all.

他是个很好的球员，但是在前两三年，在联队，他基本不上场。

知道朴智星吗？ - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

My favorite football player, I'd have to say... let me think about that for a second, there's a lot of them.

我最喜欢的橄榄球运动员，必须得说……让我想想，太多了。

美国和美式足球 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

So the strategies below 1 and above 2 are never a best response for Player I.

也就是说小于1及大于2的策略,都不是参与人I的最佳对策

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So these strategies down here less than 1 are never a best response for Player I.

参与人I的小于1的策略,永远都不会成为最佳对策的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

I'll just remind us of what these functions are; it's a - c over 2b - q2 over 2 and accordingly for Player 2.

再说一遍,参与人2的方程是,/2b - q2/2

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And the strategies above 2 were never a best response for Player II.

大于2的也不是参与人II的最佳对策

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So this is a choice for all except person "i" or Player i.

它表示除i外其他参与人每人的策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And all these strategies for Player II are gone, and all these strategies for Player II are gone, and what's left? A lot of scribble is left.What's left?

参与人II的这些策略被剔除了,参与人II的这些策略也被剔除了,划掉的都剔除后,最后剩什么了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

I know that Player 2's best response for every possible choice of Player 1, which if we had done it would be q2 hat is going to a -c over 2b--q1 over 2, right?

参与人1不同策略下参与人2的最佳对策,即q2帽等于/2b - q1/2

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So to say it in words, Player i's strategy "s'i" is strictly dominated by her strategy "si," if "si" always does strictly better -- always yields a higher payoff for Player i -- no matter what the other people do.

用文字来描述就是,参与人i的策略s'i严格劣于si,如果si总是更好的选择,即总能给参与人i带来更高的收益,而无论其他参与人怎么选

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Okay, so I'm going to draw for the case, I'm going to draw the best response of Player I and I'm going to draw the best response for Player II in a minute, for the case B equals 1/4.

好的,我们要画这个案例的图像,我要在图中画出参与人I的最佳对策,一会还要画出参与人II的最佳对策,在这里B等于1/4

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Similarly, for Player II, the lowest Player I could ever do, is choose 0, in which case Player II would want to choose 1, so the strategies below 1 are never a best response for Player II.

同理,参与人I最低只能选0,此时参与人II应该会选1,小于1的策略不是参与人I的最佳对策

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选