OK, so do we know anything so far that we can point to that would give us a departure?
好,到目前为止我们能在我们了解到的,东西中找出一些违背这些规律的例子吗?
I should actually ask, any questions about anything that I've asked or said so far, up to this point?
实际上我应该问,目前为止,对我所说所问的有问题吗?
So, you might have noticed that we will have spent about 6 and 1/2 lectures just getting to the point where we have only one electron, so we're only up hydrogen so far.
你们可能已经注意到了,我们已经花了6周半的时间,来仅仅是讲到单电子问题的情形,我们现在只研究氢原子。
So platina is like a diminutive of silver, but we now know that platinum is far superior to silver It is far more noble. It has a higher melting point, a higher chemical inertness, a fantastic metal.
所以普拉塔就像一个小小的银,但我们现在知道普拉塔比银要好很多,更为珍贵,熔点更高,化学惰性更高,是一种非常不可思议的金属。
So, by definition, we'll be run by morons pretty soon We're not too far from that right now -from that point in our economic history.
所以理论上说公司很快就被傻子们所掌控了,我国的公司离那一点不远了,-离经济史上那一节点不远了。
If this theory you might say of sort of cataclysmic change is true we cannot rule out the possibility that a constitution like ours or even identical to ours existed at some point in the ancient past in the far distant past that Aristotle knew about.
你们可能认为,如果这个理论,即剧烈变革的理论为真,我们就不能排除,像美国宪法,或相同于美国之其它现存宪法,早在远古。
So what I've said so far is, a particle moving in time from point to point can be represented by a graph, x versus t.
到目前为止,我说过,一个质点随时间的连续运动,可以用一幅x-t图来表示
As far as I can see,the best option for the body theorist at this point is to add--no surprises here--a no branching rule.
据我所知,肉体理论者最好的选择就是,毫无意外地,是加上一条无分支规则。
I want to emphasize the point that the various arguments that I have been talking about so far, although they have this common strand-- "Inference to the best explanation"-- are each separate and distinct arguments.
强调一点,到现在为止,我提及的各种论据,尽管它们都是,最佳解释的推论,但每一个都是独立而分明的
应用推荐