f truth is the recognition of the systematic character of a certain kind of error, then it would be fully dependent on the prior existence of this error.
如果真理是,对一种错误的系统化字符的认可,那么它会完全依赖于这个错误的先前存在。
We are constantly looking for values of F and we're constantly looking for responses or bodies to a known force.
我们不断地寻找 F 的值,我们不断地探索已知力对物体的作用
- Then you declare a float called f and then assign it -- -- let me scroll up for the folks in front -- that give return value of GetFloat.
然后你声明一个float类型f,再赋值-,让我向上为你们回滚到-,给出了GetFloat的返回值。
You can also assign to a list, or to an element of a list. So ivy sub 1, f -15 or example, could be assigned minus 15, and that will actually mutate the list.
此外你还可以给一个数组,或者数组内部的元素赋值,比如ivy。sub,可以被赋值为,这确实改变了数组。
What about the fact that-- We said there's a family of arguments, all of which have the general structure, inference to the best explanation, you need souls in order to explain feature F. Plug in a different feature F and you get a new argument.
这个事实怎么样,我们说过有一大类观点,它们有一些共同的结构,有关于这个最佳解释的推论,需要用灵魂的概念,来解释功能特征F,代入一个不同的,功能特征就会得到一个新的论点
The power of linearity is F=k1+k2 if I come across f of x, y, z equals k1 plus k2, if it is a linear equation, I don't have to go and solve it all over again.
线性的威力是,一个方程,如果它是个线性方程,那么我就不用再去解他了。
But luckily we don't have to worry about how we're going to picture all this, now that I said that, no physical interpretation f or a wave function, there is a physical interpretation for what a wave function squared means.
如何想象这些图像,我这么说,虽然波函数,物理解释,但波函数的平方,有物理解释,当我们说到。
But f or Gadamer and his tradition, it's a little different.
但是对伽达默尔和他的传统,这有些不同。
So they began to call this A and this B and this C and this D and this E, this F, this G.
他们开始把这叫做A,B和C,这个是D,E,F,G
A Review of B. F. Skinner Chomsky is one of the most prominent intellectuals alive.
s,Verbal,Behavior,乔姆斯基是如今仍然在世的,最杰出的学者之一。
F.D. stands for full disclosure -this is a SEC regulation.
.D.是指公司财务信息的完全披露,这是证交会的一项规定
You got a plus f and a minus f, so you got to do what you got to do.
这里有一个正 f 和一个负 f,所以你知道该怎么办
So isn't f already a float?
所以f不是已经是个浮点数了吗?
> But isn't f already a floating point?
>,但是f不是已经是一个浮点数了吗?
There is a striking parallel here in that the group one elements have a tendency to want to give up electrons, F Cl Br whereas the fluorine, chlorine, bromine, have a tendency to attract electrons.
这儿有高度的相似性,每个组都有,失去电子的趋势的,相反的,则是有得电子的趋势。
Newton says F = ma, so to make it a useful result of this problem, we know the mass of this guy.
牛顿指出 F = ma,这对于解决这个问题很有用,我们知道这个物体的质量
应用推荐