Okay, not to dwell too much on math because you can very quickly bore someone in computer science by dwelling too much on math but it's useful even for logical constructs as we'll see with loops.
不要过于纠结于这些数学问题了,在计算机领域,你会很讨厌那些,在这上面钻牛角尖的人,但是对于那些,像循环这样的逻辑结构又是很有用的。
We even have entire disciplines like economics and psychology and I dare even say modern political science that reinforced this view of human nature.
看吧,我们有一整套经济学,和心理学的理论服务于个人,而且我敢说,在现代政治科学上,更是强调了人的个体特性。
If you're going into any science that uses mathematics, chemistry, or engineering, or even economics -- you should find the contents of that useful.
如果你要进入任何要使用数学的理工科专业,比如化学,工程,甚至是经济学,你会发现书上的内容很有用
Even if a nuclear explosion took place and everything on earth got atomized and destroyed, through some bizzare science fiction chain reaction. They always do in the movies.
即使发生核爆炸,像某些离奇科幻小说里描述的,的连锁反应那样,一切都毁灭了,电影里经常可以看到的场面。
Fine. But there are reasons to study development even if you are not interested in children because sometimes developmental studies and developmental data and developmental science can inform questions about adults.
没关系,但即使你对儿童不感兴趣,却依然有很多原因促使你去研究发展,因为发展的研究,数据以及科学,有时可以解释成人的问题
But he believed that it was important to take the tools of science, to take the tools of rational thought and apply them to the good of the state, even if you saw that good of the state as in ships that could lob cannonballs even further against hostile ships, and that kind of thing.
但他同时还认为,借助利用科学和理性的工具,来为国家利益服务也是非常重要的,即使你所看到的所谓"国家利益",只是军舰上的炮弹能比敌舰射得更远,或者其他诸如此类的东西
Even those of you who've taken AP computer science or something similar perhaps recall that even just getting a piece of input from the user is ridiculously not obvious.
你们中上了AP计算机科学这门课,或者类似的课程的人可能还记得,即使只是从用户那里得到一个输入,也相当麻烦。
Or,is Williams right,that no,even in principle go as fantastic and science fictiony as you want ? in principle an immortal life could not be desirable?
或者Williams是否说得对?,即使原则上,你可以尽情想象无尽的美好和科幻,原则上永生并不令人向往?
应用推荐