At bottom, Empson doesn't really settle into the rigorous consideration of the author, the text, or the reader as if they were separate functions.

实际上，Empson并不会,仔细考虑作者，文本，读者这些因素,就好像他们各有功能一样。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Empson But Empson I hope you enjoy.

我也希望你们能喜欢。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

For Empson, there's a kind of a fluid and easy movement back and forth between what for hermeneutics are three very different phenomena: author, text, reader.

对Empson来说，在作者，文本，读者之间,诠释学里认为这是三种非常不同的现象：,在三者之间有一种流畅的反复的关联。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

All right. So Empson is fascinated by this passage, and then he gives you, in the next few paragraphs, the amazing variety of grounds for his fascination.

好的，Empson对这段十分着迷，接下来的几段，他写了他为此着迷的，各种原因。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So Empson says, Well, atmosphere, ; certainly that exists and we can talk about it in all sorts of ways; but after all, what is the use of atmosphere?

所以，Empson就说，气氛这种东西嘛，当然是存在的，我们可以用千千万万种方法来探讨它;,但是，所谓“气氛“有何作用呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

First of all, Empson doesn't really kind of settle into - a sense that it's all about the reader-- that is to say, that it's all about the reader's experience of the literary.

首先，Empson并没有真正,从读者角度考虑问题-,也就是说,没有从读者的文学经历上考虑。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

The last chapter of Seven Types of Ambiguity, his seventh ambiguity, is actually, as Empson said, about "some fundamental division in the writer's mind."

在《朦胧的七种类型》的最后一章，第七种朦胧，Empson提到，“作者思维的本质区别“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

I think Empson is the funniest person who has ever written literary criticism.

我认为Empson在所有写过文学批评里头的人,算是最有趣的一个了。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

As I say, this is the sense in which Empson follows Richards.

我认为，在这个方面Empson和Richards观点一致。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

The brief excerpt you have in your photocopy packet-- - I trust that you have picked it up by this time at Tyco -- from Empson is taken from Seven Types of Ambiguity.

在你们复印件里也有节选-,现在你们也应该都从，Tyco复印中心拿到了-,从Empson的《朦胧的七种类型》中节选的部分。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

This is the mode of William Empson.

这就是William，Empson的风格。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选