• The defenses had to do with necessity, their dire circumstance, and, implicitly at least, the idea that numbers matter.

    有人说他们在那样的处境下,不得已而为之,并且暗含了“人数重要“的理念。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • So in oxygen we have a similar situation where, in fact, we are not going to promote any of the electrons because we have two lone pair electrons no matter what we do.

    在氧中,情况很类似,我们不能激发电子,因为无论如何我们都有两个孤对电子。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • In other words, what is there--which is a kind of way of talking really has to do with what Gadamer means when he talks also about die Sache, the subject matter.

    换句话说,存在,确实和伽达默尔所说的,事情本身有联系。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • And what they did was they wanted to understand how much do genes matter.

    这个研究是关于,基因的重要性。

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • They think, it doesn't matter what I do, I'm going to get the same consumption as everybody else, so I'll just get lazy-- a very fundamental problem, which you probably are already aware of.

    因为他们知道,无论做了什么,都会享受与其他人相同的消费水平,所以偷懒就行了-,想必你们都已经意识到了,道德风险在这里是极其重要的问题。

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • The difference with the do while loop, as the syntax kind of suggests, is that this construct is going to do something no matter what.

    作为建议的语法,do,while循环的不同之处,是这个结构不管怎么样,它会做一些事情。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • And what would I have to do for those groups to matter such that, for instance, if I separate you in one group and you're in another group and I give you a hundred dollars will you give the money more to him or to him, will you give it more to your own group or to another group?

    我要用什么办法让这些群体,对立到…举个例子,我把你们分到这个群体,把你们分到另一个,我给你们一百美元,你们会把钱给他还是给他?,你们会把钱给自己群体的,还是另一个群体的?

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • So conceptually the key difference here, besides the syntax looking slightly different, it just means that if you want a chunk of code to execute no matter what initially, ; you can use the do while loop; if you want to check a condition first, you can use the while loop.

    所以概念上,则关键的区别是,除了语法看起来有点不同,它的意思是如果你想要一段代码,最初无论如何都要执行,你就可以用do,while循环;,如果你想要先检查条件,你可以用while循环。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • I was just finding very tunnel vision-like, the smallest elements at that moment in time which means I don't know anything about the other elements other than they are not the smallest and so no matter what with Selection Sort I had to repeat this again and again and again and if you do out the math it's roughly N squared steps in the worst case as well.

    我只有一个狭窄的视野,只知道某时刻的最小元素,就意味着我并不知道其他元素的任何情况,只知道它们不是最小的,所以不管怎样,在选择排序中,我就得一遍一遍地重复选择过程,在最坏情况下,大概需要N的平方次比较。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • No matter what we do in terms of promotion, we're always going to have three unpaired electrons.

    不管我们怎么激发,我们总有3个未配对的电子。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定