The defenses had to do with necessity, their dire circumstance, and, implicitly at least, the idea that numbers matter.
有人说他们在那样的处境下,不得已而为之,并且暗含了“人数重要“的理念。
So in oxygen we have a similar situation where, in fact, we are not going to promote any of the electrons because we have two lone pair electrons no matter what we do.
在氧中,情况很类似,我们不能激发电子,因为无论如何我们都有两个孤对电子。
In other words, what is there--which is a kind of way of talking really has to do with what Gadamer means when he talks also about die Sache, the subject matter.
换句话说,存在,确实和伽达默尔所说的,事情本身有联系。
And what they did was they wanted to understand how much do genes matter.
这个研究是关于,基因的重要性。
They think, it doesn't matter what I do, I'm going to get the same consumption as everybody else, so I'll just get lazy-- a very fundamental problem, which you probably are already aware of.
因为他们知道,无论做了什么,都会享受与其他人相同的消费水平,所以偷懒就行了-,想必你们都已经意识到了,道德风险在这里是极其重要的问题。
The difference with the do while loop, as the syntax kind of suggests, is that this construct is going to do something no matter what.
作为建议的语法,do,while循环的不同之处,是这个结构不管怎么样,它会做一些事情。
And what would I have to do for those groups to matter such that, for instance, if I separate you in one group and you're in another group and I give you a hundred dollars will you give the money more to him or to him, will you give it more to your own group or to another group?
我要用什么办法让这些群体,对立到…举个例子,我把你们分到这个群体,把你们分到另一个,我给你们一百美元,你们会把钱给他还是给他?,你们会把钱给自己群体的,还是另一个群体的?
So conceptually the key difference here, besides the syntax looking slightly different, it just means that if you want a chunk of code to execute no matter what initially, ; you can use the do while loop; if you want to check a condition first, you can use the while loop.
所以概念上,则关键的区别是,除了语法看起来有点不同,它的意思是如果你想要一段代码,最初无论如何都要执行,你就可以用do,while循环;,如果你想要先检查条件,你可以用while循环。
I was just finding very tunnel vision-like, the smallest elements at that moment in time which means I don't know anything about the other elements other than they are not the smallest and so no matter what with Selection Sort I had to repeat this again and again and again and if you do out the math it's roughly N squared steps in the worst case as well.
我只有一个狭窄的视野,只知道某时刻的最小元素,就意味着我并不知道其他元素的任何情况,只知道它们不是最小的,所以不管怎样,在选择排序中,我就得一遍一遍地重复选择过程,在最坏情况下,大概需要N的平方次比较。
No matter what we do in terms of promotion, we're always going to have three unpaired electrons.
不管我们怎么激发,我们总有3个未配对的电子。
应用推荐