Say it again: if everyone chose 1, then everyone's best response would be to choose 1, so that would be a Nash Equilibrium.

重复一下,如果每个人都选了1,那么每个人的最佳对策也就是1,这就会成为纳什均衡

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

oh I chose Up because I thought the other guy was going to choose Left."

哦,我选上是因为,我认为对手会选左

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

They don't understand that somebody could choose what you chose in a malicious way.

他们并不理解,有些人可以心怀恶意去做事情

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

okay I chose Middle because I believed that the other guy was going to choose Right and Middle was the best thing for me to do against Right."

我选中是因为,我认为另一个人会选右,并且选中是右的最佳策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Okay, so you chose Alpha right? So why did you choose Alpha?

你选了α对吧,你为什么要选α呢

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So, in particular, let's start working out what share of the votes you'd get if you chose position 1 or position 2, against different positions the other guy can choose.

先来看看如果你选择立场1和2,在你对手选择不同立场时,你分别能获得多少选票

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So if the other person's choosing Right with probability 0, that's the same as saying they're going to choose Left, and if I chose Middle against Left, I get what?

如果对手选右的概率是0,也就是说对手选左,此时我选中的收益是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Good, so even if everyone in the number-- everyone in the room didn't choose randomly but they all chose a 100, a very unlikely circumstance, but even if everyone had chosen 100, the highest, the average, sorry, the highest two-thirds of the average could possibly be is 66 2/3, hence 67 would be a pretty good choice in that case.

好的,如果每个人,教室里的每个人不是随机选择数字,而是全选了100,这好像不太可能,但如果每个人真的都选了100,就是最大的书,那平均数,抱歉,平均数的2/3会是66又2/3,此情况下67应该是个不错的选项

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选