It's really hard for candidates to convince you, that they really are a left, or a right, or a centrist candidate.

通常候选人很难让选民相信,他们是左派,右派,或是中间派

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Have you heard about the candidates, though?

你有听说过那些候选人吧？

What do you 实战 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

So things that are good candidates for divide And conquer are problems where it's easy to figure out how to divide down, and the combination is of little complexity.

因为适合用分治算法解决的问题,最好是能够简单的将问题进行分解,并且合并的过程不是非常的复杂,只要比线性方案要小。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

After all that looks a lot like the Downs-Hoteling model, we've got two candidates exactly at the middle, is that an equilibrium?

毕竟那看起来很像当斯-霍特林模型,我们有两个绝对在中间的候选人,那是个均衡吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

First, let's run through some other things that might be appealed to as candidates for feature F.

首先,让我们来了解一下其他,那些备选的功能特征的诉求对象

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That's why all these arguments that we all get into these days about third-party political candidates what do we really need in our political culture, what would break apart the stagnation of our two-party system, if that's what people want or put more directly, will Michael Bloomberg run or not?

这就是我们今天为何面对这些争论,关于第三方党派的候选人,也就是我们的政治文化中究竟需要什么,什么能打破我们两党制停滞不前的现状呢,如果这是人民所愿,或者更直接的说,迈克尔.布隆伯格的做法行得通吗

耶鲁公开课 - 美国内战与重建课程节选

And once we have positive candidates we can apply them to the same pathway Shown on the right and hopefully get regeneration.

一旦有了这种稳定的替代物,你就可以实施右边显示的这项计划,进行批量的繁殖。

斯坦福公开课 - 7个颠覆你思想的演讲课程节选

If there's a tie, half the voters at that position go for one of the candidates and half of them go for the other.

如果是平均,一半的选票划给其中一个候选人,另一半给另一个候选人

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So in politics, this is about candidates crowding close together towards the center, to try and get as many voters who are close to them.

在政治学中,这是关于候选人集中趋向中间立场,从而拉拢更多立场相近的选民的理论

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So in principle, in that election in 2000, there was at least four candidates, as it were, four things you could do with your vote.

原则上,在2000年那场大选中,应该有四个选举人,因为你可以投出四种选票

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The prediction here is that the candidates are going to be squeezed towards the middle.

预测最终结果是,候选人会被挤到中间立场

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Now here we ended up with two centrist candidates, which is a result pretty close to what we saw in the Hoteling model, Is this an equilibrium?

现在我们最终有2个中间派候选人参选,这与我们,在霍特林模型中看到的非常相似,这是一个均衡吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So another issue here is, I just assumed that there were two candidates.

另一个问题是,我假设只有有两个候选人

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

But as you all know, those candidates almost all have track records, and not everybody believes that Clinton, that Hilary Clinton, is quite so centrist as she now seems.

但你们也会发现,几乎所有候选人都有政绩可寻,并不是所有人都相信希拉里?克林顿,像她自己说得那样,是个中立派

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We're just saying we want What we're saying is, we know that the candidates aren't going to position themselves at 1 and aren't going to position themselves at 10.

我们只是想,我们要说的是,我们知道候选人,不会选择立场1,同样也不会选择立场10

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The candidates here are going to try and choose positions.

这两个候选人需要选择自己的政治立场

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选