And it's this final movement of the simile, according to this ingenious argument by Geoffrey Hartman, that Hartman calls the counter-plot.
根据哈特曼灵巧的论点看来,这就是这个比喻最后的深意,他称之为反计。
We need to think about important things, particularly about politics and the social order" -by the way, a very powerful argument in 1935.
我们要考虑重要的大事,特别是有关政治和社会秩序的“,要说的是,这在1935年是很强势的理论。
Glaucon Or Socrates and Glaucon, who hope to rule ? by the powers of reason, speech, and argument?
或像苏格拉底和,所希望,统治要视理性,演说及辩论的力道而定?
This is an argument that's been developed really quite brilliantly by a great Milton critic, William Kerrigan.
这是伟大的弥尔顿评论家,威廉姆·克里根发展起来的观点。
So let me go ahead and pull up the staff solution 15 to the standard edition for a moment, the game is called 15, it takes one command line argument which is the dimensions of the board 3 by 3, 4 by 4, I'll do it 4 by 4.
下面我们继续,等一会儿,我会给出标准的解答,这个游戏叫做,有一个命令行参数,标识其大小是,3阶还是4阶,我选择4阶。
self First argument by convention is always self, because it has to point to the instance, and then I pass, in this case, another couple of arguments in.
第一个参数往往是,因为它必须指向实例,然后我传入了,在这个例子中。
For precisely the reasons that are pointed to by the rest of the argument.
这个论证的其余部分,会为我们指出切确的原因
The prosecutor wasn't swayed by that argument.
但控方并不为之所动。
He says at the outset of his argument, "There are some," he says, indicating this is an opinion held by many people.
他说在他的论述之外,“有些人“他这么说,点明了这是很多人所持的看法。
So if what Socrates means by invisibility is the first notion: can't be seen with your eyes, then the argument is not any good, harmony is a pretty compelling counterexample.
所以如果苏格拉底说的无形,是第一个意思:,眼睛看不见,这个论证就不好,和声是个很有说服力的反例。
By convention, it's Arg C, because it means argument count.
按照惯例,它叫ArgC,因为它的意思是参数计数。
by Michel de Certeau, which makes this argument in sustained form. I recommend it to you.
作者是米歇尔德赛都,这篇文章有力地证明了这个论点,建议大家读一下。
Maybe more by now. But let's, for the sake of argument, ten billion pages.
可能更多了,但是让我们想想,一百亿个网页。
At the end of last class, we started sketching an argument that comes from Descartes, the Cartesian argument, that says merely by the process of thinking, on the basis of thought alone, it tends to show that the mind-- We all agree that there are minds.
在上次课的最后,我们开始简述一个,来自笛卡尔的论证,或称为卡氏论证,这个论证说仅仅通过思考,仅仅在思想的基础上,它就能证明心灵,我们都承认有心灵
Maybe the argument goes wrong by assuming that identity--when A is equal to B, it's always equal to B, no matter what.
也许这个论证就错在,假设了同一性,即当A等于B的时候,它总是等于B,无论情况如何
应用推荐