Well, the initially tempting thing to say is not only aren't you broken, but you're actually engaged in P-functioning.

首先要说的会是,不仅你没有被破坏，还有确实,拥有人格功能性。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

or you can work in fields that relate to law but aren't exactly law.

也可以是一些和法律相关，但不是只涉及法律的工作。

在哪都可以实习 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

It could also say, what are the methods associated with the string, 1. I'm sure you can quickly graph it, but notice they aren't the same.

我们也可以说，与字符串1相关联的方法有哪些？,我相信你们可以很快的求出来，但是请注意这跟前面的。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

But, you know, the formalists' own basic distinctions are dualistic, aren't they: the distinction between poetic and practical language, the distinction between plot and story, the distinction between rhythm and meter?

但是，形式主义所认为的区别却是双重标准的，诗歌语言和实用语言的区别，情节和故事的区别，节奏和韵律的区别？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Exactly, but -- In a democracy. Aren't you for democracy?

确实，不过-,身处民主制中，你不赞成民主吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

That is, in real life, the variables that you'd normally control aren't some combination of entropy and these variables, but really their temperature, volume and pressure, any couple of those, might be what you'd really have under experimental control.

在生活中，我们所能控制的,不是熵和其他变量的组合，而是温度，体积，压强，以及其中的两两组合,这些才是试验中所能控制的。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

Because as you'll soon find, when you're writing programs 0 that aren't just four lines long but are 40 or 400 which very quickly becomes easy, you'll find that even you the next morning have no idea what this code does for whatever reason, and just having some English comments is a huge boon to comprehension for yourself and others.

你们自己写程序时就会发现,用40行甚至400行代码来代替繁杂拥挤的4行代码0,将会让事情简化许多，你会发现，即使由于某些原因,你不知道如何写代码，先写些注释，于人于己，都是好事,易于理解嘛。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Another little pop quiz here, and these aren't trick questions necessarily, but if you had to guess what the bigger problem was in the developing world, so let's not just say outside the U.S.

我们再做一个小测试,这不是什么难题,你们猜猜,发展中国家面临最大的问题是什么,我们所说的不是美国以外的国家

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

My argument must be wrong because it goes against the lesson of the class and the lessons of the class are gospel right, they're not wrong ever, so what's wrong with that argument? Yes, Ale Well because you have to be able to agree, you have to be able to speak to them but we aren't allowed to show our partners what we wrote.

这个说法肯定有问题,因为这和我们的结论刚好背道而驰,结论是绝对正确的,结论没错,那这个说法错在哪,艾尔,因为你必须要能够达成一致,你需要和他们谈判,但是我们不允许同伴看到我的选择

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

All right. So those of you that are raising your hand, and some aren't raising their hands but that's okay, those of you almost unanimously say that the Beethoven Fifth Symphony sounds somewhat ominous to us, somewhat fateful to us, and the Beethoven Ninth Symphony conversely has a different sort of feel to it.

你们其中的有些人举起了手,其他的没有举,其实都很好,你们当中的几乎一致认定,贝多芬第五交响乐,听起来是对宿命的激烈的抗争,然而贝多芬第九交响曲相反的,采用了另外的一种不同的方式

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

And these aren't necessarily so incompatible but the evolutionary perspective I think would argue that you can feel that kind of love for more than one person or at least it would facilitate the passing on of your genetic material to a larger array of the next generation.

两种观点不太相容,但是持进化论观点的人认为,你可以和两个以上的人拥有完美式的爱情,至少会促进,你的基因传给更多下一代的人。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

Piaget was really big into question and answer, but one problem with this is that children aren't very good with language, and this might lead you to underestimate how much they know.

皮亚杰非常热衷用问与答的方法进行研究,但这里存在的一个问题便是,儿童并未能完全掌握语言,这可能会导致你低估他们的理解能力

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选