At this point it's wonderful: Samson begins to echo Milton from the invocation that we've been looking at, the invocation to Book Three of Paradise Lost.

这里很奇妙：,参孙开始附和弥尔顿的祈求,我们刚才看到的失乐园第三卷中的祈求。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

It's not until Book Three, until after Milton presents his heroic portrait of Satan and his heroic portrait of the fallen angels when he establishes the fact of his blindness.

直到第三卷弥尔顿呈现,他对撒旦和降落的天使们的英勇形象后,他才证实自己失明的事实。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

In the book in which the essay "The Intentional Fallacy" appeared, a book called The Verbal Icon, Wimsatt collaborated with Monroe Beardsley on three essays, and this is one of them.

意图谬误“是文萨特与比尔兹利一起，为一本叫做《语言象征》的书,写的三篇文章中的一篇。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

And so it appears, the three conversations end, Book I ends with uncertainty about what justice is.

而这显露出在三段会话结束时，在第一册结束时,正义仍是无法确定的概念。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Huge, and one of the things that I argue in this book and also in the Princeton Projiect on National Security which I co-directed with John Ikenberry over the last three years is we have been singel-mindedly focused on the war on terror.

很大，我在这本书中试图说明一点,在普林斯顿国家安全项目中也试着强调,这一项目在过去3年内由我和约翰伊肯伯里共同负责,那就是我们仅仅盯在了一点上,我们盯着恐怖主义战争不放。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

So for next week, I ask you read the first 50 pages and I think they are the reading never get to be much... The second book which was published only in May of this year, Three Philosophical Filmmakers is longer so some of those chapters are a little longer.

所以下周，我要求你们读完前50页,我觉得这些阅读任务,并不太长。,第二本,在今年5月左右出版的书，叫《三个电影哲学家》,所以一些章节会有点长。

麻省理工公开课 - 电影哲学课程节选

The conclusion reached in Book Three is that God has foreknowledge but he isn't interested in actual predetermination or some type of divine action that literally compels the behavior of human creatures.

卷三中的结论是,上帝享有先知，但是他对,实际意义上的预决或强迫着人类行为的,所谓神圣的做法并不感兴趣。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

God the Father will make a similar argument in Book Three.

上帝，人类之父会在卷三中做出相似的回应。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

So, for next time you'll read Book Three.

所以，下次我们会读到卷三。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

It's not until Book Three of Paradise Lost that the poet explicitly reveals to us, to his readers, the fact of the physical handicap that might reasonably be thought to render impossible his composition of the poem.

直到失乐园第三卷,诗人才明确告诉读者们，自己失明的事实,这可能被合理的认为是他无法完成诗歌创作的原因。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

I'm convinced that it's the reader's job to apply the same degree of critical scrutiny, a kind of Galilean critical scrutiny, to the image of Providence that will be elaborated, as you will see, at extraordinary length in Book Three of Paradise Lost.

我相信，把同等程度的细致的挑剔的观察,一种伽利略式的吹毛求疵的观察精神，运用到对将要被详细说明的天命的形象上去，是读者该做的事，你们往后会发现，卷三里洋洋洒洒写了很多。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选