So the body theorist can avoid the problem of fission, avoid the problem of duplication by adding the no branching rule.

肉体主义者能避开分裂问题，通过无分支原则，避免复制导致的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Now that's not a problem for the body view, because on the body view, the question is "it's the same body."

这对于肉体论而言并不是个问题，因为肉体论，只看重，是否是同样的肉体“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Right now at this point in our course, whenever you have a problem where there is some body and someone says, "Write all the forces on it", what you have to do is very simple.

现在在我们这个课程里,如果你遇到一道题目,题目给了你一个物体,并要求你,"写出该物体所受的所有力",你要做的其实很简单

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

There can be a supply of them, a storehouse of them that can build up in the body, and so day-to-day fluctuations become less of a problem with fat soluble then water soluble vitamins, because the body can go grab them from a storage depot, if you will.

从而在体内建立起一个供应源,一个脂溶性维生素仓库,这样一来,相比起水溶性维生素,脂溶性维生素的浓度不会每天剧烈波动,因为机体可以任意取用体内的储存

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

In fact,so what we see is,the body theory is in exactly the same problem, exactly the same situation,as the personality theory.

事实上，从我们所见能得出，肉体理论，和人格理论具有一样的问题和情况。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

The problem for the body view that fission raises, in a nutshell,is that bodies can split.They can branch.

肉体理论的问题产生，总而言之也是由于肉体可以分裂。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

in fact,have splitting of personality So the very same case raises the very same problem for both the body view and the personality view.

分裂人格的可能,就是这同一个案例引起了从肉体理论,和人格理论两个角度相同的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If he can convience us that the soul is not like harmony of the body, maybe there will be some sort of problem for the physicalist.

因为如果他能说服我们,灵魂不像是身体的和声,那么就会给物理学家留下些问题了。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If we accept the body view,we avoid the duplication problem.

如果接受肉体理论的观点，就避免了复制的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If I can use science fiction to talk about the possibility of splitting, and use that against the personality theory, I'm entitled to use science fiction examples to talk about the possibility of bodies splitting,and ask, what kind of problem that would raise for the body theory?

如果我能用科幻作品来谈论人格的分裂，用来驳斥人格理论，我也可以用科幻作品的例子,来探讨肉体分裂的可能，并提问，那会给肉体理论造成什么问题？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So if this is really Shelly Kagan's brain over here, then this isn't a problem for the body view.

如果这边的真是Shelly，Kagan的大脑，那么肉体理论是没什么问题的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选