Right, this makes a lot of sense because if the entire atom was made up of nuclei, then we would have 100% probability of hitting one of these nuclei and having things bounce back.
因为如果整个原子,都是原子核,那我们就有100%概率,撞到一个原子核并被弹回来,所以如果我们。
All right? Because if I don't do any swaps on a pass through the algorithm, then it says everything's in the right order.
好么?因为如果我,这一遍没有做任何交换,那么就意味着已经排好序了。
That's because the banker is thinking, if I have this amount right now and I invest it for one year, then what do I have.
那是因为银行认为,如果我现在持有这些钱并将其投资一年,然后我会得到什么
Natural right is mutable because different circumstances will require different kinds of decisions. So does this mean then that for Aristotle there are no universally valid ? standards of justice or right?
自然权利是易变的,因为不同的情况,将需要不同种的决策,这是否就意谓着亚里士多德,认为没有寰宇合法的,正义与权利标准?
Right, because then everyone knows that there's going to be a death, whereas the cabin boy didn't know that this discussion was even happening, there was no forewarning for him to know that "Hey, I may be the one that's dying."
对,因为这样所有人都知道会有人死,而不是像之前派克被完全蒙在鼓里,根本没有人预先警告他,可能抽到是我死“
Right? If that was the case in that code, then my complexity is no longer log, because I need linear access for each time I've got to go to the list, and it's going to Lisp be much worse than that.
这里的复杂度不再是对数的了,因为每次在列表中,查找需要线性访问,可能还要糟糕,其实,有些编程语言,如。
System of linear equations. What are the equations here? Well, I could say, you know, the number of pigs plus the number of 20 chickens equals 20, right? Because we've got 20 heads. And then what else do I have?
如何解决这个问题呢?,用线性方程式的办法来解决,等式是什么呢?你应该知道,猪的数量加鸡的数量等于,对吧?因为我们有20个头?
But you know, you kind of wonder if that's a good example for fire insurance because if the whole city burns down, then insurance companies would go bankrupt anyway, right?
但是你也许会疑惑,对于阐述火险来说,这是不是个好例子,因为如果整个城市被烧毁,那么保险公司就会破产,对吧
应用推荐