So we try to remember to say "Wimsatt and Beardsley" even though it is Wimsatt who taught at Yale.

所以我们总说“文萨特和比尔兹利“,尽管在耶鲁教书的只有文萨特。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

In the book in which the essay "The Intentional Fallacy" appeared, a book called The Verbal Icon, Wimsatt collaborated with Monroe Beardsley on three essays, and this is one of them.

意图谬误“是文萨特与比尔兹利一起，为一本叫做《语言象征》的书,写的三篇文章中的一篇。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Again it's Wimsatt and Beardsley, but I already explained how that is.

再次来看文萨特和比尔利兹的观点，尽管我已经说过了。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

You can see that when Wimsatt and Beardsley talk about the "success" of the poem, they understand the whole critical enterprise, - including its theoretical underpinnings-- the question of what is a poem, - the question of how should we best read it-- to be still geared toward literary evaluation.

大家应该发现，当文萨特与比尔兹利谈到,诗歌创作的“成功“一词时，他们完全理解了文学评论体系，这包括适用于文学评估的理论根基-,就是那些关于什么是诗歌，还有我们如何解读的问题-,这些都对文学评估很重要。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Beardsley by the way was actually a philosopher who taught at Temple University, a good friend of his.

顺便说一句，比尔兹利其实是个哲学家,他在Temple大学教书，是文萨特的好朋友。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选