Please don't, if you are up here, become complacent because a month from now we will have another test.
如果你考得不错的话,请不要自满,因为在一个月后我们将还有一次测试。
They're inside that loop-I've got the wrong glasses so I'm going to have to squint- and we've got one test which is a comparison we've got another test which is a multiplication-- sorry, not a test, we've got - another step which is a multiplication- and another step that is a subtraction.
他们在循环里面呢,我带错眼镜了所以不得不斜视-,然后我们这里有一个比较的测试,还有一个乘法的测试,-对不起,不是测试,是另外一个乘法的步骤-,还有一个减法的步骤。
And so, there will be another test.
因此,会有另外一个测试。
With this basic principle of utility on hand, let's begin to test it and to examine it by turning to another case, another story, but this time, not a hypothetical story, a real life story, the case of the Queen versus Dudley and Stevens.
有了这条最基本的功利原则,让我们检验一下这条原则,是否适用于另一案例,而这一次,就不再是假定的事件了,是个真实的故事,女王诉达德利和斯蒂芬斯案。
About 10 to 15 years later, another physicist, Ernest Rutherford, actually put this plum pudding model to test, Ernest Rutherford and he did it through studies that he'd been doing on radiation that was emitting something called alpha particles.
因此我们要,在上面再做改进,大概过了10到15年,另外一个物理学家,用实验来检测这个李子布丁模型,他一直从事alpha粒子辐射研究。
I spotted an error here, I could have spotted it by running it on different test sets, and using prints things, another way of doing it, but this idea of at least simulating it on simple examples lets you check a couple of important questions.
操作么?我在这里发现了一个错误,我也可以通过运行不同的测试集,或者运用print声明来发现这个错误,但是至少应该用简单的例子来手工模拟下,代码的思想可以让你,对一些很重要的问题进行检验。
应用推荐