• That is to say, if something causes literature, there must be some sort of authority behind it and therefore we find ourselves asking, "What is an author?"

    即是说,如果文学有缘由的,它的背后一定存在作者,所以我们会问,“作者是谁?“

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Does he want to say that he's just an author function, that his textual field is a kind of set of structural operations within which one can discover an author?

    他是不是想说他只是个功能性的作者,而他所写的文章只是一套,用于发现作者的结构上的应用程序?

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • And unless, you know, you've been hired to do Pirandello's Six Characters In Search Of An Author, this is not a great thing, because you get something that is really confusing.

    可能一点关系也没有,要是你拍的是皮兰德娄的荒诞名剧,《六个找寻作家的角色》,那可能是件好事,因为你得到的是一个足够混乱的结果。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Wise Blood was written by an author congenitally innocent of theory, but one with certain preoccupations.

    慧血》作者从来不局限于理论范畴,而是有自己的侧重点。

    耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

  • In a way, there's a subset of questions that arises from those, to the effect that this is, of course, what we'll be taking up next time: the question "What is an author?"

    从这些大问题中又会产生一些小问题,这些问题也将是我们以后会讨论的:,关于文学的缘由,我们接着又会问,“作者是谁?“

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • One of the reasons this understanding seems so problematic is the idea that we don't appeal to the authority of an author in making our mind about the nature of a given field of discourse.

    这种理解之所以看起来有问题,一个原因就是我们不会为了弄清一个特定领域话语的本质,去诉求作者的权威。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • It's a question rather of how we know the author to be there, firstly, and secondly, whether or not in attempting we should appeal to the authority of an author.

    首先我们如何知道作者在那儿,其次,决定文本意义的时候,如果作者只是一种功能。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • This is the framework in which the then most prominent intellectual in France writes an essay at the very peak of the student uprising, entitled "What is an Author?"

    后来法国最杰出的知识分子,在学生起义时写过一篇名为“作者是什么?“的文章,其指导思想就是这个“

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Nabokov When we moved on to Nabokov, we had an author trying to imagine a work of art so autonomous from the world that it could be something like an autonomous form of life.

    接下来我们说了,这是一位试图将文学作品想象为发自世界,以至于成为生活的一种自主形式的作家。

    耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

  • You get the idea that everything arises from the extraordinary mental acuity or spiritual insight of an author and that what needs to be understood about literature is the genius of its production.

    你发现一切,都源自这些作者的敏锐头脑和深刻见解,关于文学,你需要理解的,是这些天才的作品。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • But to speak of an intentional structure as a center is not at all the same thing as to speak of an intending person, author, being, or idea that brought it into existence, because that's extraneous.

    但是讲到一个作为中心的意向性结构,与讲到一个创造它的人,作者,存在,或概念是完全不同的,因为那是外来的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • He says, "They aren't authors. They're founders of discursivity," and then he grants that it's kind of difficult to distinguish between a founder of discursivity and an author who has had an important influence. Right?

    他说:“他们不是作者,他们是散漫性的创始人“,然后他认为很难区分,究竟散漫性的创始人和作者,哪个的影响更重要,对吗?

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定