Like how can you possibly figure that out with actually compelling a machine to do it for you and sure enough we chatted for a few moments, I kind of gently pointed out well it's kind of like problem 7 last year.

就好像去逼计算机为你做这件事,就能解决问题一样,我们确实谈过这个问题，我委婉地告诉他,这种情况与我们去年讲过问题7类似。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

We basically had 7 classes every year, so I took quite a variety.

我们每年最少会有7门课，所以我选了这么多。

关于早期入学申请 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

Looking at this particular group, he estimated survivorship bias to be 4.4% per year and backfill bias to be 7.3% per year.

分析这个特定的样本,他估算其生存偏差每年达到4.4%,回填偏差每年达到7.3%

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

My first response as a 17-year-old was to rage.

7岁的我的第一反应是愤怒。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

In another year, however, the stock market lost 5% and Shiller, Inc. Lost 7%.

另一年,股票市场下跌了5%,希勒公司.下跌了7%

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

So,we're talking about a group of funds that in aggregate probably produced somewhere in the low teens returns and he's got 11.7% per year combined survivorship bias and backfill bias.

因此我们说这组基金总体上,大概产生了略高于10%的收益率,他算出的数字是每年11.7%,结合了生存偏差和回填偏差

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

In the case of Burt Malkiel's data, more than 11% per year and in the case of Roger Ibbotson's data between 7% and 8% per year of those returns can be explained either by backfill bias or survivorship bias.

在伯特·麦基尔的数据中,超过11%的年平均收益,在罗杰·伊博森的数据中,7%到8%的年平均收益,可以用生存偏差或回填偏差来解释

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

The hedge fund world is 7.1% first to third quartile, real estate 9.3% per annum, leveraged buyouts 13.7% per annum this is over a ten-year period, so now we're starting to talk about some pretty significant dispersion.

在对冲基金中,这个差距有7.1%,不动产投资中的差距是9.3%,杠杆收购中是每年13.7%,以上都是十年期收益,我们现在谈的是,一些显著的差距

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选