And the problem is the same sort of dynamic plays itself out even in the scientific debate back and forth.

问题是，心理动力在科学辩论中,也是以相同的方式在进行循环辩证。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

His complex relationship with Socrates is Alcibiades by the way recounted in the drunken speech that Alcibiades gives in Plato's dialogue Symposium.

他与苏格拉底间,复杂的关系，都由酒醉的,娓娓道来，并记录在柏拉图的,《飨宴篇》辩证中。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Well, there are the various parts of our physical body, but there's also our soul. Remember, as I said, in introducing the Phaedo, Plato doesn't so much argue for the existence of something separate, the soul, as presuppose it.

肉体由许多不同的部件组成,但是同样也有灵魂,我在介绍斐多篇的时候,提到柏拉图并没有花大力气,去辩证肉体之外存在个什么东西,他直接默认了灵魂的存在

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But how did Plato intend this dialogue to be understood? Note that Socrates never defends himself by reference to the doctrine of unlimited free speech.

但柏拉图到底想要这场辩证,如何被理解呢？请注意,苏格拉底的自辩从未援引,无限自由言论学说。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

So the ensuing debate within the dialogue can be read as a struggle again over ? who has title to rule. Is it the people?

所以，接着发生在辩证中的辩论,便可解读为再度陷于,谁有权统治的挣扎之中，是人民吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

The allusion to Aristophanes and the comic poet is a part of what Plato calls in Book X of the Republic the old quarrel between philosophy and poetry.

提及亚里斯多芬尼斯,是柏拉图《理想国》第10卷中所述,哲学与诗学长时争论的一部份,这项争论亦是柏拉图辩证的主体。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Did Plato want us to read the dialogue this way?

柏拉图希望我们这样解读辩证吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选