Negative 1 plus 0 should add up to negative 1, if in fact, we're correct for the c n anion.
负一加上零应该等于负一,如果是这样,我们对于氰离子的结果就是正确的。
We had one win, two ties and probably twenty or twenty-two losses.
我们只取得了一胜、两平、20或22负的战绩。
So, what we're looking at here is the force when we have two charged particles, one positive one negative -- here, the nucleus and an electron.
我们现在研究的是,一正一负俩个带电粒子之间的,作用力-在这里。
I have shown that by taking Avogadro's number of individual ion pairs and putting them all together in a line, the system's energy became more negative.
我推导出了,从每一个离子对中抽出阿伏加德罗常数,再把它们放在一起在一列中,这个系统的能量就变得更负。
So we can just write out what those are, minus w prime over q1 prime q1 is greater than minus w over q1.
因此可以写出,负w一撇除以q1一撇,大于负w除以。
Most recently--A few years ago, we were living in a regime of negative real interest rates, when the Fed was pursuing a very aggressive monetary policy.
就在最近几年之前,我们生活在,负实际利率的政策中,当时美联储追求一种,非常激进的货币政策
Negative reinforcement is just a type of reward.
负强化只是奖励的一种形式而已。
This thing better start turning negative soon or we are going to change the way the world works here.
它们很容易一开始就转化成负的,或者我们将取改变那儿工作方式。
So, if we think about the second case here where we have c n minus, now we're talking about a molecule with a net charge of negative 1.
那么,如果我们考虑的是第二个例子,也就是氰离子,那么现在我们讨论的是一个净电荷量为负一的分子。
So, that also tells us that the n minus ion is less stable than the neutral atom itself.
而且,这还告诉我们,负一价的氮离子不如中性氮原子稳定。
And we know what that's equal to, this is something we've been over and over, ionization energy is simply equal to the negative of the binding energy.
而且你知道它等于什么,这是我们说过一遍又一遍的,电离能就等于,负的束缚能。
So that means if we add up all of the formal charges within the molecule, what we would expect to see is that they sum up to give a net charge of negative 1.
那么这就意味着如果我们把这个分子中,所有的形式电荷加起来,我们应该会看到它们加起来,之后得到的净电荷量为负一。
So in our first structure, we would find for the nitrogen we have a formal charge 5 minus 4 minus 2, because we're starting with 5 valence electrons, so that is a formal charge of minus 1.
那么在我们的第一个结构中,我们发现氮的形式电荷量是五减去四4,再减去二,因为我们开始有五个价电子,因此它的形式电荷量是负一。
SdT This has minus T dS minus S dT, but the dT part is zero because we're at constant temperature.
这一项包含负的Tds和,但是dT的部分等于零,因为温度为常数。
So we end up with a formal charge on carbon of negative 1.
因此最终我们得到碳的形式电荷量是负一。
And if we talk about what's going on in areas, or with atoms that have high electronegativity, and we think about whether they're electron donors or electron acceptors, what would you expect for an atom that has high electronegativity?
如果我们要讨论这片区域的情况,或者说讨论这些电负性很高的原子,我们会把它们想象成电子的施主,还是受主?,大家认为哪一种,是电负性很高的原子?
But you need to be able to predict what kind of properties a certain atom's going to have within a molecule, whether you're talking about something, for example, that's very electronegative, or something that is not electronegative at all, it is going to make a difference in terms of thinking about how molecules are structured and also how they interact with other molecules.
但是你需要能够预言,什么性质,某个原子在分子中能够具有,无论你讨论的是哪一种情况,比如,它有很高的电负性,还是它根本没有电负性,都将会产生影响,对这个分子的结构,以及与其它分子相互作用的情况。
Which is to say q1 plus q2 is equal to minus w1 plus w1 prime plus w2 plus w2 prime.
即q1加q2等于2,负的w1加w1一撇1,加w2加w2一撇。
So for example, that might have a formal charge of negative 1, because to some extent it has gained that much electron density that it now has a formal charge that's negative.
比如,可能它的形式电荷为负一,因为在一定程度上它得到了这么多的共用电子密度,那么它现在就有了负的形式电荷。
So if we want to write out what that would be, it would just be to say that f minus is isoelectronic with neon.
那么如果我们把它写出来,它应该就是负一价的氟离子与氖原子是等电子的。
So, we can say that -- if we have neon here and we want to think about what's isoelectronic, -- f minus would be isoelectronic. We also have oxygen -- what would the charge on oxygen be? Um-hmm, right. 2 minus.
那么,我们可以说--如果我们这里有氖原子,而我们想知道与它等电子的是什么,负一价的氟离子就是与它等电子的,我们还有氧-,氧应该是几价的?没错,负二价。
So, for example, if we think of the fluorine minus case, would you expect fluorine minus to be larger or smaller than neutral fluorine? Okay. I heard mostly larger, but a little bit of a mix in there, and it turns out that larger is correct.
比如,如果我们来考虑一下负一价的氟离子的话,大家认为它大一些还是小一些?,对比于比中性氟原子,好的,我听到大部分人说大一些,但是也有一些不同意见,而正确答案应该是大一些。
It's always a good first approximation, because you need to start somewhere in terms of drawing Lewis structures, but then if you go and figure out the formal charge and you just have lots of charge separation or very high charges, like a plus 2 and a minus 2 and a minus 1 all different places in the atom, what it should tell you is maybe there's a better structure.
它总是一个好的第一近似,因为在画路易斯结构的时候,你总需要一个起点,但是如果你在算出形式电荷之后,发现有很多电荷分开了,或者说有很高的电荷,比如有一个正二,一个负二,还有一个负一1,在原子的各个地方,这应该就是在告诉你,或许还有一个更好的路易斯结构。
And again, this is just the negative, the binding energy, when we're talking about the 2 p orbital.
再说一遍,这就是负的束缚能,当我们考虑,2,p,轨道的时候。
w So that means that minus w prime must equal w And w is greater than zero.
也就是说负w一撇等于,在这之中。
We can write out what it is for any certain atom or ion x, X so it's just x plus an electron gives us x minus.
我们可以用,X,来表示一个任意的原子或离子,因此可以写成,X,加一个电子等于负一价的。
So the ratio of the logs is just minus one.
所以这两个log的比是负一。
But we know that minus w prime w is the same thing as w.
我们知道,负w一撇等于。
So chlorine, if we talk about it in terms of electron affinity, we would be writing that we're actually gaining an electron here, and getting the ion, c l minus.
那么,氯,如果我们要讨论它的电子亲和能,我们会假设它真的得到了,一个电子而变成离子,负一价的氯。
He introduced the concept of electronegativity which was a measure, therefore, it is quantitative, of the atom's ability to attract electrons within a covalent bond and developed a scale of electronegativity.
他引入了电负性这一概念,一个反映着原子在成共价键时吸引电子的能力的数据标度,因此这是数量上的,在共价电子中,电子原子能吸引电子,并发展为一定规模的电负性。
应用推荐