This is what Tynjanov says: In formalist historiography, the prime significance of major social factors is not at all discarded.

提尼亚诺夫这样说：,在形式主义者编写历史时，并没有完全忽略主要社会力量的重要性。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

It's important in Darwinian terms to have it in the back of our minds, and that's what Tynjanov is insisting on.

它是达尔文主义的重要特征，也是提尼亚诺夫坚持的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

At the moment we have been assigned four TAs, though looking around we won't need four TAs, but at the moment we have Da-Ihn Yoo, we have Michael Verriman, we have Andrey Ivanov, and we have Brian Reilly.

目前给我们安排了四个助教,虽然我觉得用不了四个,不过我们目前还是有余大有,和迈克尔·韦里曼和安德烈·伊凡诺夫,还有布莱恩·莱利

耶鲁公开课 - 1871年后的法国课程节选

That's why I gave you the extraordinary passage on your sheet, the end of Tynjanov's "On Literary Evolution," written also 1927, written also, in other words, in response to Trotsky's Literature and Revolution.

这就是为什么我给你们了这篇精彩的文章阅读，1927年蒂尼亚诺夫在，文学进化，中写道，这也是，他对托洛斯基，文学与革命，的回应。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

If you are reminded here by the passage of Tynjanov that I gave you where he makes the distinction between literary history as evolving and literary history as modified by outside circumstances, I think it would be a legitimate parallel.

如果你们可以会想起我以前让你们读的提尼亚诺夫,那篇区分作为演变和,由外界因素改造的文学史的文章，那么一切就合乎逻辑了。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选