-
There is a self-consciousness in the thinking about structure that we find in many places in Levi-Strauss that Derrida freely acknowledges in his essay.
在列维的作品中,我们能找到多处对结构认识的自觉,德里达在自己的论文中也承认了这种自觉的正确性。
-
But the unmistakable physicality of the heaven imagined in the poem about Diodati gives us some idea, I think, of how to read the end of Lycidas.
但在关于迪奥达蒂的这首诗中弥尔顿所想象的,天堂的物质性是无可置疑的，这能给我们一些启发，帮我们理解《利西达斯》的结尾。
-
Obviously, Gadamer refuses to argue that we can distinguish in that way reliably.
显然，葛达玛并未争论我们是否能,正确地区分这两者。
-
Anybody who looks at Greek mythology and Greek poetry, and Greek stories sees there is a powerful influence coming into Greek thought from mainly the Mesopotamian direction.
任何浏览过希腊神话,诗歌和故事的人,都能发现来自美索不达米亚的文化,对希腊思想的巨大影响
-
Now if this is the case, it seems to me that one has found a loophole in Gadamer's conservatism about what the reader can do.
如果是这样的话，我认为大家在葛达玛对,读者理解能力的保守主义论中,能找到一个漏洞。
-
And so Milton concludes Lycidas with this standard vision of Christian consolation.
弥尔顿用这能给人以慰藉的,正统基督教视角写下了《利西达斯》的结尾。
-
This then is the object of historicizing and, as we'll see at the end of the lecture, there's a certain nobility about it to be juxtaposed with the nobility of Gadamerian hermeneutics.
这就是历史化的目标，在这节课快结束的时候我们会了解到，能和伽达默尔的解释学并置,它是受人尊敬的。
-
Deconstruction calls into question the distinction between language and thought in calling into question the distinction between signifier and signified, even though, as Derrida says, it can't do without a Saussurian vocabulary.
解构主义怀疑,语言和思想的区别，其方式是,怀疑能指和所指之间的区别，尽管如此，正如德里达所说没有索绪尔词汇也是不行的。
-
But in the meantime it's probably on this occasion, once we accept them both as having come under the influence of the same form of linguistic thinking, to say a little bit about the similarities and differences that exist between Derrida and de Man.
但同时在这种场合下可能，一旦我们接受这俩概念，在受到同样的语言学思想的影响后,我们就能看到一些,德里达和德曼之间存在的相同点和不同点。
应用推荐